[download]13,2 Mb - Eco - Tiras

20082009Fig. 2. Structure of shrew communities in the last two yearsIt constituted only 11.11 %, while the pigmy shrewconstituted about 15 %. The trappability index varied from1 % to 15 % from all the micromammal species.We have to mention the high abundance of bicolourwhite-toothed shrew in the last several years. Its densityincreased gradually since the beginning of the XXI centuryand reaches its maximum in 2009. It was recorded notonly in natural and wet biotopes, but also in more aridones and in agocenoses. In abandoned lands the specieswas even more abundant that the common shrew andits trappability index constituted 10 % from all the smallmammals.Like in the previous year the Mediterranean watershrew wasn’t recorded in the studied biotopes. Itsabundance in the republic ecosystems decreaseddrastically in the last 20 years and it becomes a very rareand critically endangered species. This fact is causedby the degradation of wet habitats and of water basinspollution. We recommend it to be introduced in the thirdedition of Red Book of Moldova.ConclusionsThe structure of shrew community showed significantchanges during the last decades. The most well adaptedspecies is the common shrew. The bicolor whitetoothedshrew, which was critically endangered species,introduced in the red Book of Moldova, became one ofthe most common among shrews in the last years. Inopposite the Mediterranean water shrew that was oneof the most abundant in the past century, at present iscritically endangered, because of the destruction andtransformation of its natural habitats. The pygmy andlesser white-toothed shrews are wide spread in varioustypes of ecosystems, but their abundance is always below20%. The shrew species are good ecological indicators.Further measures on the protection of shrew habitatsmust be taken.Bibliography1. Munteanu A. Mamifere. Natura Rezervaţiei „Plaiul Fagului”,2005, p. 244-265.2. Nistreanu V. Soricidele (Soricidae, Insectivora) din colecţiamuzeului Laboratorului Vertebrate Terestre al Institutului de zoologie alA.S.M. VI Conf. of Zoologists of Moldova, Chisinau, 2007, p. 43-44.3. Nistreanu V., Spreading of insectivore species (Erinaceidae,Talpidae, Soricidae, Insectivora) in Nistru river basin. TransboundaryDniester river basin management and the EU Water FrameworkDirective. International Conference, 2-3 October 2007, p. 213-217.4. Nistreanu Victoria, Munteanu A., Savin A., Caraman Natalia,Beneş O., Gheorghiţă S., Burlacu Victoria, Uspenscaia Inga. Datepreliminare privind răspândirea soricidelor (Soricidae, Insectivora)pe teritoriul Republicii Moldova. Simpozion Internaţional consacratjubileului de 60 de ani al academicianului Ion Toderaş. Chişinău, 2008,p. 68-70.5. Nistreanu V. Spreading of shrews from genus Sorex onthe territory of Republic of Moldova. Annual Zoological Congressof “Grigore Antipa” Museum, 12-13 November 2009, Bucharest,Romania, p.50.6. Аверин Ю.В., Мунтяну А.И., Чегорка П.Т., Гавриленко В.С.,Лункашу М.И., Савин А.И. Млекопитающие. Природа ЗаповедникаКодры. Кишинэу «Штиинца» 1984, стр. 57-64.7. Лозан М.Н. Насекомоядные. Млекопитающие. «Животныймир Молдавии». Кишинэу «Штиинца», 1979, стр. 25-40.8. Лозан М.Н. Насекомоядные млекопитающие Молдавии(Insectivora, Mammalia). Экология птиц и млекопитающих Молдавии.Кишинэу «Штиинца», 1975, стр. 96-118.9. Мунтяну А.И., Савин А.И. Млекопитающие. «Фауна биоценотическихоазисов и ее практическое значение». Кишинэу «Штиинца»,1992, стр. 179-202.10. Нистряну В., Бурлаку В., Караман Н. Распространениебелозубок (Soricidae, Insectivora) на территории Молдовы. Современныепроблемы зоо– и филогеографии млекопитающих. Пенза.15-20 мая, 2009, стр. 60.11. Тихонов И.А., Котенкова Е.В., Успенская И.Г., КоноваловЮ.Н., Бурлаку В.И., Бенеш О.А., Георгица С.Д., Караман Н.К., ТихоноваГ.Н., Хрыстин В.А., Нистреану В., Мунтяну А.И. Грызуны и насекомоядныенезастроенных территорий г. Кишинева. Proceedingsof 4 th International Scientific-Practical Conference “Urboecosystems:problems and Prospects of Development”, Ishim, 19-20 March 2009,p.310-315.12. Тихонов И.А., А.И. Мунтяну, И.Г. Успенская, Ю.Н. Коновалов,В.И. Бурлаку, О.А. Бенеш, С.Д. Георгица, Н.К., Караман, Г.Н.Тихонова,В.А. Хрыстов, В.Б. Нистреану, Е.В. Котенкова. Видовое разнообразиемелких млекопитающих на примере г. Кишинэу. Геоэкологическиеи биоэкологические проблемы Северного Причерноморья. МатериалыIII Межд. научно-практической конференции. 22–23 октябряТирасполь 2009, стр. 200-203.13. Тихонова Г.Н., И.А. Тихонов, Е. В. Котенкова, И. Г. Успенская,Ю.Н. Коновалов, В. И. Бурлаку, В. Нистреану, О.А. Бенеш,С.Д. Георгица, Н. К. Караман, В.А. Хрыстов, А.И. Мунтяну. Сравнительныйанализ населения мелких млекопитающих незастроенныхтерриторий двух Европейских городов (Москвы и Кишинева).Diversitatea, valorificarea raţională şi protecţia lumii animale.Simpozionul internaţional consacrat celei de-a 70-a aniversări din ziuanaşterii profesorului universitar Andrei Munteanu. Chişinău, Ştiinţa2009, p. 117-120.— 150 —