FY2017 PROPOSED BUDGET

Recommendations

Info

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Proposed Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Appendix D Allocation of State and Local Support State and local funds account for approximately 45 percent of the funding for Metro’s annual operating and capital budgets according to the approved subsidy calculations, described below. Operating Budget The operating budget subsidy is allocated to the jurisdictional funding partners using six subsidy allocation formulas: 1. Regional bus subsidy allocation 2. Non-regional bus subsidy allocation 3. Rail maximum fare subsidy allocation 4. Rail base subsidy allocation 5. Paratransit subsidy allocation 6. Debt service allocation Formulas 1 and 2: Regional and Non-Regional Bus Subsidy Allocations The Metrobus subsidy is allocated using two distribution formulas. All bus routes are classified as being either regional or non-regional, based on route characteristics. Regional bus routes generally provide transportation between jurisdictions. Regional bus routes may also include bus routes that serve major activity centers that operate on major arterial streets, and carry high volumes of riders either in one jurisdiction or in multiple jurisdictions. The following are the specific criteria used by the Regional Mobility Panel to classify bus routes. • Inter-jurisdictional routes are defined as regional. Defining characteristics of interjurisdictional routes: o Cross a jurisdictional (independent city, county, state) boundary; o Penetrate at least two jurisdictions by more than one-half mile in each; and o Operate “open door” (allows boarding and alighting) over at least a portion of the line in two or more jurisdictions • If a route does not qualify as regional under the inter-jurisdictional definition, then it must meet at least two of the following three criteria to be regional: o Arterial Streets: Operates for a considerable distance on an arterial street and a substantial portion (usually a majority) of riders use stops on the arterial street. Routes which operate for a short distance on an arterial incidental to their service area are not included o Regional Activity Center: Serves one or more regional activity centers. A conservative definition of regional activity centers is used, including only those where there is virtually universal agreement as to their regional character. Routes which feed Metrorail stations, but which do not directly serve any regional activity center, are not considered to be regional D-4
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Proposed Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Appendix D o Cost Effectiveness: Annual boardings per annual platform hour greater than 30 applied consistently in all jurisdictions Routes which do not meet the criteria described above are classified as non-regional. Regional and non-regional bus subsidy is allocated to the jurisdictions using the following formulas. • Regional Bus Subsidy Allocation. The distribution of regional bus subsidy to the jurisdictions is based on a weighted, four-factor formula in the following proportions: 1. Density weighted population 25% 2. Revenue hours 25% 3. Revenue miles 35% 4. Average weekday ridership 15% Density weighted population is determined by taking the urbanized area population distribution for the compact area (50 percent weighting) and combining it with the weighted population density (urbanized population divided by area). The formula prorates the urbanized population distribution by people per square mile. The revenue hours factor is determined by taking the annual revenue hours assigned to each jurisdiction divided by the total regional revenue hours. The revenue miles factor is determined by taking total revenue miles assigned to each jurisdiction divided by the total regional revenue miles. Ridership is determined by taking the average weekday ridership (month of May sample) for each jurisdiction divided by the total average weekday ridership. • Non-Regional Bus Subsidy Allocation. The distribution of non-regional bus subsidy to the jurisdictions is computed as follows: 1. Identify the costs of all Metrobus service, regional and non-regional 2. Identify the costs which would accrue for regional Metrobus service if no nonregional bus service were provided 3. Determine the costs of non-regional service by subtracting the regional Metrobus costs, as calculated in step two, from the costs of all Metrobus service 4. Divide the costs of non-regional service as computed in step three by total platform hours for non-regional service 5. Identify the non-regional platform hours for each jurisdiction 6. Multiply the platform hours for each jurisdiction by the hourly rate 7. Determine the revenue for each jurisdiction 8. Subtract from costs the revenue as determined in step seven Formulas 3 and 4: Rail Maximum Fare and Base Subsidy Allocations The rail subsidy consists of two components: the maximum fare component and the base rail component. The total maximum fare subsidy is deducted from the total rail subsidy, and the result is allocated based on the base subsidy formula. D-5
Page 1 and 2:
S A F E T Y, S E R V I C E A N D F
Page 3 and 4:
For Metrorail, we will continue our
Page 5 and 6:
Jim Corcoran was appointed as a Pri
Page 8:
Table of Contents Chapter I. Introd
Page 11 and 12:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transi
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
A-2 Proposed FY2017 Budget Appendix
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Project Description WMATA FY2017 Ca
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Proposed FY2017 Budget Appendix A P
Page 165 and 166:
WMATA FY2017 Capital Project Summar
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Proposed FY2017 Budget Appendix A P
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Project Description This project re
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228: WMATA FY2017 Capital Project Summar
Page 229 and 230: Project Description WMATA FY2017 Ca
Page 265 and 266: Proposed FY2017 Budget Appendix A S
Page 267 and 268: Washington Metropolitan Area Transi
Page 277: Washington Metropolitan Area Transi
show all

FY2017 PROPOSED BUDGET

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?