Archeologické rozhledy LX–<strong>2008</strong> 259The presented work offers commented results of carpological and xylotomical analyses of 61 samplesin total, found in the sump E. This sump was much richer in vegetal remains (also in artefacts) thanthe sump B of the same age, explored before (Dohnal 1986; 1987). At the time when this couple ofsumps was in function, all refuse from the hospital was collected in the yard covered with gravel.Also refuse from two flats of the employees of the Prague Castle and from the neighbouring house inwhich a Spanish envoy was living till 1610 was collected there. Perhaps latrine enclosures used to standover the cesspits (latrine board, stinking contents inside). Pollen analysis has not been performed.The material was flushed in a standard manner through a 0.5 mm mesh screen; vegetal remainswere dried up, separated and determined by means of stereo magnifying glass. Approximately29 800 diasporas + 5000 fragments of seeds, fruits, wood and charcoal were obtained (refer to tab. 1).As much as 60 % of the total number of taxa was utility plants. Compared with medieval finds in Pragueand in the Czech Republic, a large share of spices and medicinal plants was noticeable. This factcorresponds well with the finds of little glass bottles and small stoneware containers for medicamentsand pharmaceuticals, evident requisites of the hospital. Foodstuff remains – especially those of fruit,spices, less frequently occurring species of vegetable, oil plants and cereal plants – bear relation tothe finds of kitchen things (spoons, forks, pots, lids, dishes, jugs, beakers, etc.) including a preciousdish for rice of Chinese origin, from the time of the dynasty Qing. The wildly growing ruderalspecies, weeds and plants typical for damp meadows, as we have them in Prague repeatedly documentedfrom the Malá Strana/Lesser Town (Čulíková 1998; 2001), were markedly less representedhere. Evidently, the yard was closed, without a direct access for the ruderal species.High employment of cultivated species (fruit, oil plants, spices, vegetables, cereals) as well asemployment of numerous wild species in home healing as well as in official medicine should besupposed in the Renaissance period, the same as during the Middle Ages. Approximately 100 taxawith a possible function of a drug were present. The properties of rustic tobacco (fig. 1), the circumstancesof the find of its seed, first in the sump in Kanovnická Str., later on at the nearby Hradčanskénám./Sq. (Čulíková 2007) indicate that tobacco had rather the function of a medicinal plant thanthat of a smoking material in spite of the fact that remnants of pipes were found in the sump. It ispossible that tobacco was cultivated in the nearby Royal botanical garden or even in the area ofHradčany. Many species of utility plants were common for both the mentioned sites within theHradčany area.Aregular occurrence of numerous macerated leaves (in total 68 + 41 fragments) of common box(Buxus sempervirens – fig. 5) in as much as one third of the studied samples was another remarkablefind. Their presence in the object of the hospital, medicinal properties of the bark and especially ofthe leaves employed till today (at healing of gout, rheumatisms, syphilis, dermal diseases) whichwere elaborated and commented already in the Czech translation of the Matthioli’s herbal (1596),indicate the possibility that this woody plant was introduced into Bohemia already before 1835 (cf.Koblížek 1992) and was already successfully cultivated in the Renaissance Prague, at the time whenthe sump was filled. Of course, the pollen has not been found so far in the anthropogenic sedimentsin the Czech Republic hence neither import (of plants or extract?) from Southern Europe can be excluded.From the imports, in addition to tobacco, it was rice (Oryza sativa – fig. 4) that was also presentin Kanovnická Street. So far, rice is registered in the territory of the Czech Republic since the 14 thcentury (Kühn 1995) but even the finds from the early Modern Era are not frequent here. Evidentlyalso fig-tree (Ficus carica – more than 4000 seeds) is an import. In our country a limited quantityof it was cultivated in fig-tree gardens and orangeries.From the species introduced into Bohemia during the height of the Middle Ages it was sugarymelon (Cucumis melo) and very soon, in the 16 th century, it was common pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo –fig. 3). The former finds of pumpkin seeds in our country were known only from two sites situatedwithin the area of Prague (Holý 1972; Opravil 1994) and from Southern Moravia (Opravil 1985).It cannot be determined from the finds whether the found fruits of coriander (Coriandrum sativum)and those of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) were produced in Bohemia (Prague) or if also these mean
260âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a léãiva z ranû novovûké jímky hradãanského ‰pitáluan import. Especially in the case of coriander, the instructions for its growing in the Matthioli’s herbalcould indicate its cultivation also in Bohemia. Both the species were also found at the Hradčany square,coriander is documented from several medieval sites, fennel is a rarity in the objects from the modernperiod (Opravil 1974; Kočár et al. 2007). We suppose cultivation of lovage (Levisticum officinale).The find of stones of numerous cultivars of so called blue fruit, i.e. plum-trees (Prunus domestica– fig. 6–10), peach-trees (Persica vulgaris – fig. 11) and seeds of common medlar (Mespilus germanica– fig. 12) gives the hint of changes in the conditions of cultivation of fruit in the RenaissancePrague in comparison with the Middle Ages. The seeds of common medlar were the first archaeobotanicalfind from the early Modern Age in the Czech Republic. The occurrence was evidently relatedwith the medicinal properties of the fruits.The same as at the Hradčanské nám./Sq., also summer savory (Satureja hortensis) and mint(Mentha sp.) were present. Poisonous species such as Agrostemma githago, Conium maculatum,Hyoscyamus niger, Vaccaria pyramidata could possibly serve as a drug whose function was to mitigatepains.The analysis of macroremains proved that also an object which is “young and not much attractive”from the archaeological point of view can yield pieces valuable of botanical informations, and whatis more, in such an attractive site as Hradčany near Prague Castle.English by Helena VlčkováVĚRA ČULÍKOVÁ, <strong>Archeologický</strong> <strong>ústav</strong> <strong>AV</strong> <strong>ČR</strong> Praha, v.v.i., Bezručovo nám. 1, CZ-746 01 Opavavera.culikova@worldonline.cz
- Page 1 and 2:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 185
- Page 3 and 4:
187-228Archeologické rozhledy LX-2
- Page 5 and 6:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 189
- Page 7 and 8:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 191
- Page 9 and 10:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 193
- Page 11 and 12:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 195
- Page 13 and 14:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 197
- Page 15 and 16:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 199
- Page 17 and 18:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 201
- Page 19 and 20:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 203
- Page 21 and 22:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 205
- Page 23 and 24:
Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 207
- Page 25 and 26: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 209
- Page 27 and 28: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 211
- Page 29 and 30: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 213
- Page 31 and 32: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 215
- Page 33 and 34: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 217
- Page 35 and 36: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 219
- Page 37 and 38: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 221
- Page 39 and 40: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 223
- Page 41 and 42: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 225
- Page 43 and 44: Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008 227
- Page 45 and 46: Obr. 12b. Praha - Malá Strana. Vý
- Page 47 and 48: 230âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 49 and 50: 232âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 51 and 52: 234âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 53 and 54: 236âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 55 and 56: 238ku, Velké Británii i na Sloven
- Page 57 and 58: 240âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 59 and 60: 242insititia var. insititia), velko
- Page 61 and 62: 244âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 63 and 64: 246âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 65 and 66: 248âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 67 and 68: 250niger), třezalku tečkovanou (H
- Page 69 and 70: 252âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 71 and 72: 254âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 73 and 74: 256âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 75: 258âULÍKOVÁ: Ovoce, kofiení a l
- Page 79 and 80: Polygonum aviculare agg., rdesno pt
- Page 81 and 82: 262DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 83 and 84: 264DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 85 and 86: 266DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 87 and 88: 268DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 89 and 90: 270DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 91 and 92: 272DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 93 and 94: 274DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 95 and 96: 276DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 97 and 98: 278DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 99 and 100: 280DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 101 and 102: 282DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 103 and 104: 284DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 105 and 106: 286DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 107 and 108: 288DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 109 and 110: 290DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 111 and 112: 292DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 113 and 114: 294DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 115 and 116: 296DOBE· -VOJTùCHOVSKÁ: ¤ivná
- Page 117 and 118: 298Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008
- Page 119 and 120: 300POPELKA: ·típaná industrie z
- Page 121 and 122: 302POPELKA: ·típaná industrie z
- Page 123 and 124: 304POKORN¯: Nález zuhelnatûlého
- Page 125 and 126: 306KYSEL¯: Nálezy obratlovcÛ z e
- Page 127 and 128:
308KYSEL¯: Nálezy obratlovcÛ z e
- Page 129 and 130:
310Archeologické rozhledy LX-2008
- Page 131 and 132:
312HO·EK - MA¤ÍK - ·ILHOVÁ: Ka
- Page 133 and 134:
314HO·EK - MA¤ÍK - ·ILHOVÁ: Ka
- Page 135 and 136:
316HO·EK - MA¤ÍK - ·ILHOVÁ: Ka
- Page 137 and 138:
318HO·EK - MA¤ÍK - ·ILHOVÁ: Ka
- Page 139 and 140:
320HO·EK - MA¤ÍK - ·ILHOVÁ: Ka
- Page 141 and 142:
322HO·EK - MA¤ÍK - ·ILHOVÁ: Ka
- Page 143 and 144:
324HO·EK - MA¤ÍK - ·ILHOVÁ: Ka
- Page 145 and 146:
326HO·EK - MA¤ÍK - ·ILHOVÁ: Ka
- Page 147 and 148:
328HO·EK - MA¤ÍK - ·ILHOVÁ: Ka
- Page 149 and 150:
330BRÒÎEK: Souãasná ãeská pal
- Page 151 and 152:
332BRÒÎEK: Souãasná ãeská pal
- Page 153 and 154:
334BRÒÎEK: Souãasná ãeská pal
- Page 155 and 156:
336BRÒÎEK: Souãasná ãeská pal
- Page 157 and 158:
338BRÒÎEK: Souãasná ãeská pal
- Page 159 and 160:
340BRÒÎEK: Souãasná ãeská pal
- Page 161 and 162:
342BRÒÎEK: Souãasná ãeská pal
- Page 163 and 164:
344BRÒÎEK: Souãasná ãeská pal
- Page 165 and 166:
346Aktualityzpůsoby informace o le
- Page 167 and 168:
348AktualityODEŠLA ALENA ŠILHOVÁ
- Page 169 and 170:
350Aktuality22. Monoxyl z Čelákov
- Page 171 and 172:
352AktualityBibliografie PhDr. Petr
- Page 173 and 174:
354Nové publikaceperiodický zdroj
- Page 175 and 176:
356Nové publikaceJiž sama skladba
- Page 177 and 178:
358Nové publikaceMarkus C. Blaich:
- Page 179 and 180:
360Nové publikaceSiegmund, F. 1998
- Page 181 and 182:
362Nové publikaceovšem usnadňova
- Page 183 and 184:
364Nové publikacepozornost věnova
- Page 185 and 186:
366Nové publikaceMartin Oliva: Gra
- Page 187 and 188:
368Nové publikacetakže ojediněl
- Page 189 and 190:
370Nové publikaceliv již dalšíc
- Page 191 and 192:
372Nové publikacevých vrstev Korm
- Page 193 and 194:
374Nové publikaceců s moderními
- Page 195 and 196:
376Nové publikacez mohyly 1) šlo
- Page 197 and 198:
378Nové publikaceLiteraturaDąbrow
- Page 199:
380Anthony Harding et. al.: VELIM -