Kausales Denken, Bayes-Netze und die Markov-Bedingung

155
Buehner, M. J., Cheng, P. W. & Clifford, D. (2003). From covariation to causation:
A test of the assumption of causal power. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29 (6), 1119–1140.
Bullock, M. & Gelman, R. (1979). Preschool children's assumptions about cause
and effect: Temporal ordering. Child Development, 50, 89–96.
Campbell, J. (2007). An interventionist approach to causation in psychology. In A.
Gopnik & L. Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and
computation (S. 58–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Claerendon Press.
Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Oxford: Claerendon
Press.
Cartwright, N. (2001). What is wrong with Bayes nets? The Monist, 84 (2), 242–
264.
Cartwright, N. (2002). Against modularity, the causal Markov condition, and any
link between the two: Comments on Hausman and Woodward. The British
Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53 (3), 411–453.
Cartwright, N. (2007). Hunting causes and using them: Approaches in Philosophy
and Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chater, N. & Manning, C. D. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing
and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10 (7), 335–344.
Chater, N. & Oaksford, M. (2008a). The probabilistic mind: Prospects for a Bayesian
cognitive science. In N. Chater & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic
mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (S. 3–31). New York: Oxford
University Press.
Chater, N. & Oaksford, M. (2008b). The probabilistic mind: Where next? In N.
Chater & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian
cognitive science (S. 501–514). New York: Oxford University Press.
Chater, N., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Yuille, A. (2006). Probabilistic models of cognition:
Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10 (7), 287–291.
Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological
Review, 104 (2), 367–405.