12.12.2012 Aufrufe

“semitisches pantheon”. eine “männliche tyche” - MOSAIKjournal.com

“semitisches pantheon”. eine “männliche tyche” - MOSAIKjournal.com

“semitisches pantheon”. eine “männliche tyche” - MOSAIKjournal.com

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

DOMESTIC SPACE AND COMMUNITY IDENTITY |103<br />

courtyard house we see at Zagora by 700 BC cut the individual<br />

house off from other units, as the oikos could be accessible only<br />

through a narrow door guarded by its male kyrios and sheltering his<br />

dependent women, children and relatives from the outside world. 86<br />

Classicists often suggest that Homeric notions of gender are less<br />

rigid than those in Hesiod and later authors. 87 However, possibly<br />

eleventh – ninth century BC Greeks did interpret their simple,<br />

open houses in much the same ways as the subdivided space of<br />

Archaic and Classical courtyard houses.<br />

Difficulties in interpreting patterns in the material record as<br />

gender-related activities, in the context of the Early Iron Age and<br />

the Classical world are primarily due to the fact that these interpretations<br />

are based on vague assumptions with few concrete models<br />

available. One basic assumption that duality of patterning/dichotomy<br />

in artefact types can be directly related to the duality<br />

of gender roles is often very difficult to ascribe to the Iron Age<br />

material. 88 However, there are many socio-cultural and natural formation<br />

processes, which will affect this basic pattern and create<br />

variation in the archaeological record. A better understanding of<br />

socio-cultural aspects of the patterning of gender related activities<br />

within a household unit as well as within settlements would enable<br />

us to interpret the archaeological record better.<br />

SPATIAL EVOLUTION AND FUNCTIONALITY WITHIN<br />

EARLY IRON AGE HOUSEHOLDS<br />

The study of “social space” within Early Iron Age households can<br />

be defined with reference to the number and disposition of rooms,<br />

the subdivision of the house and the position of doorways that indicate<br />

the nature of internal <strong>com</strong>munication. The number of rooms<br />

affects internal differentiation in terms of function, arrangement<br />

and segregation. In a number of examples we already observed,<br />

that in one-room houses, multi-functional utilisation is dominant,<br />

whereas in multi-room houses the possibility of a mono-functional<br />

use for each room within the house increases. In the Early Iron<br />

86 MORRIS (2000) 283–286; WEST (1978).<br />

87 VAN WEES (1995) 154–163; MORRIS (2000) 286.<br />

88 ALLISON (1999) 2–4; TRINGHAM (1991) 93–131.

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!