29.06.2013 Views

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE ...

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE ...

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and part-time discourse markers, doing work above the sentence level. Mystery particles,<br />

on the other hand, are full-time discourse markers as they are always working at a level<br />

above the sentence, indicating a variety of interpersonal functions, e.g. denial of<br />

propositions, justifications, reprimands, eliciting pity, correcting interlocutors, etc.<br />

In more theoretical terms, this thesis contributes to the literature an account of the<br />

use of second position particles and preverbal elements as discourse markers, expanding<br />

the domain in which these elements are known to occur. This is significant as the<br />

literature to date has been virtually silent about the occurrence of discourse markers in<br />

second position, as well as those occurring as preverbs (a common grammatical element<br />

in Algonquian languages). With the contribution of the Ojibwe data, the cross-linguistic<br />

data show that discourse markers may essentially occur in any position within the domain<br />

of a sentence (or in its vicinity straddling sentence boundaries), showing that discourse<br />

markers cannot be defined by their location, as early characterizations have attempted to<br />

do (such as Schiffrin 1987). Nor can they be reliably defined by their linguistic form,<br />

since discourse markers appear to come in many forms, e.g. grammatical/lexical items,<br />

affixes, clitics, particles, including entire inflectional paradigms. Therefore, the general<br />

behavior of discourse markers cross-linguistically suggests that the identity of discourse<br />

markers and their likely locations are largely constrained by the linguistic machinery<br />

already existing in the language. For example, if a particular language does not make use<br />

of second position phenomena, we would not expect to find discourse markers in that<br />

position. The opposite case also appears to be true. If a language makes use of second<br />

position phenomena, second position would be a potential docking spot for discourse<br />

markers. The identity and the various docking spots of discourse markers are not only<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!