29.06.2013 Views

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE ...

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE ...

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Jones and Coleman 1979:91)<br />

“In light of our analysis here, it seems strange (at least from the perspective of<br />

narrative) that the mode that carries the eventline material is called conjunct in<br />

Algonquian literature, whereas the mode that primarily serves to carry background<br />

material is called independent. Undoubtedly these labels, which have been longestablished<br />

in Algonquian studies are due to the fact that isolated sentences were the<br />

primary objects of study, where the conjunct was not so apt to occur except in its<br />

more idiomatic and rather subordinate uses, e.g., locative and temporal expressions.<br />

Conjunct was thus adopted as a term to indicate its supposedly subordinate nature.<br />

It is not surprising that the more important eventline use of the conjunct was not<br />

even apparent then, since such use would only be recognized in the context of an<br />

entire text.”<br />

It is this behavior, however, which is relevant to our discussion of discourse markers,<br />

since what is really going on, I argue, is that the conjunct order of inflection itself is<br />

being borrowed, or exploited, for work at the discourse level in much the same way that<br />

individual lexical or grammatical items are exploited for use within discourse. Therefore,<br />

based upon what we know about the behavior of discourse markers, there is no need to<br />

try to reconcile both uses into one category. In short, within sentence grammars,<br />

conjuncts are dependent clauses, but in discourse (as we will see), they may be used to<br />

mark eventline structure.<br />

Now, it should also be noted here that the selection of the conjunct to carry eventline<br />

structure is not random, just as the selection of many lexical or grammatical items at the<br />

sentence level is not random. Recall that for many of the discourse connectives that it<br />

was their specific lexical or grammatical use at the sentence level that was exploited for<br />

work at the discourse level, e.g. coordinating conjunction miinawaa which functioned at<br />

the sentence level to conjoin similar grammatical categories, but also was shown to<br />

204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!