29.06.2013 Views

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE ...

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE ...

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(4) Planes of discourse (from Schiffrin 1987:24-29)<br />

EXCHANGE STRUCTURE turns in talk<br />

ACTION STRUCTURE speech acts<br />

IDEATIONAL STRUCTURE propositional content, ideas<br />

PARTICIPATION FRAMEWORK how speakers/hearers relate to each other<br />

INFORMATION STATE organization & management of knowledge<br />

and meta-knowledge<br />

It is against the background of this discourse model (which is a sociolinguistic one as<br />

opposed to a purely semantic/pragmatic one) that Schiffrin identifies and characterizes<br />

the discourse markers observed in her data. Recall that the discourse markers that<br />

Schiffrin described were: oh, well, and, but, or, so, because, now, then, I mean, y’know.<br />

These markers were all taken from a corpus of live conversations between herself and a<br />

group of Jewish neighbors in a Philadelphia neighborhood. Some examples of these<br />

markers from Schiffrin’s data are provided below, with all markers provided in bold type.<br />

Note that commas in these examples mark brief pauses, and that no commas indicate that<br />

the marker in bold is part of the intonational unit of the following content.<br />

(5) Schiffrin’s discourse markers (from Schiffrin 1987)<br />

a) Oh, well they came when they were a year. (p. 73)<br />

b) Well, when y’get to the cemetery, y’make a right. (p. 122)<br />

c) And, he says, ‘Well I don’t know.’ (p. 133)<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!