12.07.2013 Views

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142 J.J. <strong>Haldane</strong><br />

there existed an omnibenevolent, omnipotent <strong>and</strong> omniscient being then there<br />

could not be evil, or – contraposing – that the existence of evil implies the<br />

non-existence of God. Thus, premiss (2) is false.<br />

What I have offered is a sketch of a theodicy but it is incomplete in various<br />

respects. First, there arises a question of the scale of collateral damage. An<br />

implicit assumption of my argument has been that the goods of organic <strong>and</strong><br />

rational life outweigh the harms resulting from them. It is difficult to conceive<br />

of how the various values <strong>and</strong> disvalues might be compared, but I would<br />

allow that if it could be shown that overall the universe is a bad thing then<br />

that would refute the claims of theism. Since I maintain that theism is true,<br />

I hold by implication that the universe is overall a good thing. However, one<br />

significant aspect of its deficiencies is not within God’s power to limit, short<br />

of destroying the universe, or a part of it. For much that is bad results from or<br />

consists in human wrongdoing, <strong>and</strong> God cannot inhibit this while still maintaining<br />

our powers of free agency. He can, <strong>and</strong> I believe he does, act exceptionally<br />

to limit the evil caused by human choices but to do so always <strong>and</strong><br />

everywhere would involve his removing our freedom, frustrating our agency<br />

or reducing us to the level of unreasoning animals. Rather than do that,<br />

which would involve a reversal in divine creation, it may be that if human<br />

action falls so far short of the good to which it is called then the human story<br />

will be brought to an end. There is reason for God to co-operate in our<br />

actions so long as more good than evil results, but it would be folly to assume<br />

that he will keep us going come what may. Indeed, it is required for the<br />

justice of providence that he should not. In such circumstances, for God to<br />

close the book on human history would not be a reversal of the divine plan<br />

but a completion of it – <strong>and</strong> there is scriptural support (couched in harrowing<br />

imagery) for the expectation of this:<br />

Just as the weeds are gathered <strong>and</strong> burned with fire, so will it be at the close of<br />

the age. The Son of Man will send his angels, <strong>and</strong> they will gather out of his<br />

kingdom all causes of sin <strong>and</strong> all evildoers, <strong>and</strong> throw them into the furnace of<br />

fire; there men will weep <strong>and</strong> gnash their teeth. Then the righteous will shine<br />

like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears, let him hear.<br />

(Matthew 13: 40–4)<br />

This passage suggests a partial remedy to a second omission in my treatment<br />

thus far, namely the absence of any account of how, if at all, natural <strong>and</strong><br />

moral evils are addressed by God. So far as the matter of strict compatibility<br />

with bare theism is concerned no such issue may arise. It may be enough to<br />

show that evil is a privation parasitic upon the good <strong>and</strong> that the good<br />

outweighs the bad. But I remarked that any fully adequate theodicy must<br />

have a religious aspect <strong>and</strong> that this should express the content of a particular<br />

theology. Here I must be brief. Christianity teaches that suffering is a route

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!