12.07.2013 Views

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 J.J. <strong>Haldane</strong><br />

mankind by an inspired teaching authority there would be no reason to be<br />

optimistic about transcending the agnostic theism arrived at <strong>and</strong> defended<br />

through philosophical reason. Catholicism holds that this possibility has been<br />

realized through the incarnation of God in Christ <strong>and</strong> his establishment of<br />

a Church to which has been given, in the office of Peter <strong>and</strong> his successors,<br />

the ‘extraordinary magisterium’ of doctrinal infallibility. The scale <strong>and</strong> profundity<br />

of these religious claims is unmatched by any philosophical or scientific<br />

theory <strong>and</strong> I cannot even begin to elaborate, let alone defend, them<br />

now. 25 What I wish to urge, however, <strong>and</strong> I think Jack Smart would agree<br />

with this, is that it is absurd to try to arrive at an intellectual assessment<br />

of these claims, <strong>and</strong> the evidence for them, independently of taking a view<br />

on such philosophical questions as the intelligibility of the universe, the existence<br />

<strong>and</strong> character of evil <strong>and</strong> the possibility of miracles. The New Testament<br />

is a set of texts admitting of many interpretations, none of which is selfauthenticating<br />

though some of which may be inspired as, I believe, is the text<br />

itself. Miracles aside, a reader will not find God in its pages if he is not looking<br />

for him there. Unmistakably, however, the texts address a series of questions<br />

– principally ‘who is Christ?’; <strong>and</strong> the reply: ‘the way, <strong>and</strong> the truth <strong>and</strong><br />

the life’ (John 14: 6) is an answer that should elicit from the philosophical<br />

theist the response ‘<strong>and</strong> this is what we call God’, or in the Latin of Aquinas<br />

‘et hoc dicimus Deum’.<br />

Notes<br />

1 See, for example, Smart, ‘Realism v. Idealism’, in J.J.C. Smart, Essays Metaphysical<br />

<strong>and</strong> Moral (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), <strong>and</strong> J. <strong>Haldane</strong>, ‘Mind-World Identity<br />

Theory <strong>and</strong> the Anti-Realist Challenge’, in J. <strong>Haldane</strong> <strong>and</strong> C. Wright (eds),<br />

Reality, Representation <strong>and</strong> Projection (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).<br />

2 All quotations from Hebrew <strong>and</strong> Christian Scripture are taken from The Holy<br />

Bible, Revised St<strong>and</strong>ard Version Catholic Edition (London: Catholic Truth Society,<br />

1966).<br />

3 The Summa Theologiae, sometimes referred to as the Summa Theologica, but generally<br />

known as ‘the Summa’ exists in a definitive Latin/English edition published<br />

in association with Blackfriars (the Dominican house of study in Oxford) in sixty<br />

volumes (London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1963–75). A very good, single volume<br />

abridgement is Timothy McDermott (ed.), Summa Theologiae: A Concise Translation<br />

(London: Methuen, 1989). More recently McDermott has produced Aquinas:<br />

Selected Philosophical Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993). As would<br />

be expected this includes many of the philosophically most interesting passages<br />

from the Summa, <strong>and</strong> I strongly recommend it to anyone who wants to read<br />

Aquinas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!