12.07.2013 Views

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

220 J.J.C. Smart<br />

15 I was myself much in the same frame of mind about the scope of ‘logic’, when<br />

I wrote two articles of philosophical theology, of which I’m now quite ashamed,<br />

in the Flew <strong>and</strong> MacIntyre volume mentioned in note 8 above.<br />

16 For an excellent exposition, discussion <strong>and</strong> defence of Quine’s indispensability<br />

argument for the reality of mathematical entities, see Mark Colyvan, The Indispensability<br />

of Mathematics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).<br />

17 Flew <strong>and</strong> MacIntyre, New Essays, p. 54.<br />

18 In O.H. Lee (ed.) Philosophical Essays for A.N. Whitehead (New York: Longmans,<br />

1936), reprinted in Quine’s Ways of Paradox.<br />

19 William Lane Craig, ‘Review of Smart <strong>and</strong> <strong>Haldane</strong> <strong>Atheism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Theism</strong>’, Ratio<br />

(New Series) 9 (1998), 200–5.<br />

20 See Lee Smolin, Three Roads to Quantum Gravity (London: Weidenfeld <strong>and</strong><br />

Nicholson, 2000), p. 200.<br />

21 I have been helped to be even more sceptical about the fine-tuning argument by<br />

a paper by my one-time student <strong>and</strong> former colleague M.C. Bradley, ‘The Fine<br />

Tuning Argument’, forthcoming in Religious Studies, <strong>and</strong> a draft article by the<br />

same author, ‘The Fine Tuning Argument: The Bayesian Version’.<br />

22 Inquiry, 2000.<br />

23 John Leslie, Infinite Minds (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).<br />

24 M.J. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (New York:<br />

Simon <strong>and</strong> Schuster, 1996).<br />

25 Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.<br />

26 See J.J.C. Smart, ‘Moral Values’, in Revue International de Philosophie 51(1997),<br />

479–94. Because imperatives have a (recursive) semantics this account avoids<br />

objections faced by expressivism. Nevertheless it has affinity to C.L. Stevenson,<br />

who, however, confused semantics with pragmatics.<br />

27 Gilbert Ryle, ‘Systematically Misleading Expressions’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian<br />

Society, (1931–2).<br />

28 John Hick (ed.), The Metaphor of God Incarnate (London: SCM Press, 1993).<br />

29 New York: HarperCollins, 2000.<br />

30 I am using the word ‘phenomenology’ in a down-to-earth sense, not as used in a<br />

certain sort of philosophy descending from Husserl.<br />

31 For a possible explanation of the illusory phenomena, see D.M. Armstrong, ‘The<br />

Headless Woman Illusion <strong>and</strong> the Defence of Materialism’, Analysis 29, 48–9.<br />

See also J.J.C. Smart, ‘The Identity Theory of Mind’, in the Stanford Encyclopedia<br />

of Philosophy. http//plato.stanford.edu/entries/mind-identity<br />

32 In particular, see Richard Swinburne, The Existence of God (Oxford: Clarendon<br />

Press, revised edition, 1991).<br />

33 Alvin Plantinga, Warrant <strong>and</strong> Proper Function, <strong>and</strong> Warranted Christian Belief<br />

2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!