Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism
Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism
Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
220 J.J.C. Smart<br />
15 I was myself much in the same frame of mind about the scope of ‘logic’, when<br />
I wrote two articles of philosophical theology, of which I’m now quite ashamed,<br />
in the Flew <strong>and</strong> MacIntyre volume mentioned in note 8 above.<br />
16 For an excellent exposition, discussion <strong>and</strong> defence of Quine’s indispensability<br />
argument for the reality of mathematical entities, see Mark Colyvan, The Indispensability<br />
of Mathematics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).<br />
17 Flew <strong>and</strong> MacIntyre, New Essays, p. 54.<br />
18 In O.H. Lee (ed.) Philosophical Essays for A.N. Whitehead (New York: Longmans,<br />
1936), reprinted in Quine’s Ways of Paradox.<br />
19 William Lane Craig, ‘Review of Smart <strong>and</strong> <strong>Haldane</strong> <strong>Atheism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Theism</strong>’, Ratio<br />
(New Series) 9 (1998), 200–5.<br />
20 See Lee Smolin, Three Roads to Quantum Gravity (London: Weidenfeld <strong>and</strong><br />
Nicholson, 2000), p. 200.<br />
21 I have been helped to be even more sceptical about the fine-tuning argument by<br />
a paper by my one-time student <strong>and</strong> former colleague M.C. Bradley, ‘The Fine<br />
Tuning Argument’, forthcoming in Religious Studies, <strong>and</strong> a draft article by the<br />
same author, ‘The Fine Tuning Argument: The Bayesian Version’.<br />
22 Inquiry, 2000.<br />
23 John Leslie, Infinite Minds (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).<br />
24 M.J. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (New York:<br />
Simon <strong>and</strong> Schuster, 1996).<br />
25 Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.<br />
26 See J.J.C. Smart, ‘Moral Values’, in Revue International de Philosophie 51(1997),<br />
479–94. Because imperatives have a (recursive) semantics this account avoids<br />
objections faced by expressivism. Nevertheless it has affinity to C.L. Stevenson,<br />
who, however, confused semantics with pragmatics.<br />
27 Gilbert Ryle, ‘Systematically Misleading Expressions’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian<br />
Society, (1931–2).<br />
28 John Hick (ed.), The Metaphor of God Incarnate (London: SCM Press, 1993).<br />
29 New York: HarperCollins, 2000.<br />
30 I am using the word ‘phenomenology’ in a down-to-earth sense, not as used in a<br />
certain sort of philosophy descending from Husserl.<br />
31 For a possible explanation of the illusory phenomena, see D.M. Armstrong, ‘The<br />
Headless Woman Illusion <strong>and</strong> the Defence of Materialism’, Analysis 29, 48–9.<br />
See also J.J.C. Smart, ‘The Identity Theory of Mind’, in the Stanford Encyclopedia<br />
of Philosophy. http//plato.stanford.edu/entries/mind-identity<br />
32 In particular, see Richard Swinburne, The Existence of God (Oxford: Clarendon<br />
Press, revised edition, 1991).<br />
33 Alvin Plantinga, Warrant <strong>and</strong> Proper Function, <strong>and</strong> Warranted Christian Belief<br />
2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).