12.07.2013 Views

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 J.J.C. Smart<br />

ethical principle at the back of the universe. Still, Leslie’s hypothesis cannot<br />

altogether be ruled out by these considerations, <strong>and</strong> I shall have another<br />

(brief ) look at it at the end of the next section. There the prime focus will not<br />

be on design (‘Why is the universe as it is?’) but on existence (‘Why is there<br />

anything at all?’).<br />

8 The Argument from Contingency<br />

Why, then, is there anything at all? After all, a null universe is the simplest<br />

hypothesis. Of course there is a pragmatic paradox in so far as we assert or<br />

even entertain the null hypothesis. We must exist in order to assert or entertain<br />

the hypothesis <strong>and</strong> the proposition that the universe is null has to exist in<br />

order to be asserted or entertained. Nevertheless the paradox is pragmatic<br />

only, <strong>and</strong> logic does not rule out the empty universe, except for a technicality.<br />

In classical first order logic the valid schemata are defined as those that come<br />

out true in any non-empty universe. This is for technical convenience, <strong>and</strong><br />

testing for validity in the empty universe can be done separately, easily<br />

<strong>and</strong> mechanically. 56<br />

Given that the null universe would be the simplest possible, is it not<br />

a matter for great awe that there is anything at all, let alone our vast <strong>and</strong><br />

complex universe? Despite the fact that I am repelled by Heidegger’s style of<br />

philosophical writing, there is nevertheless one respect in which I have<br />

a sneaking fellow feeling with him. This is his propensity to ask why there is<br />

anything at all. 57 Wittgenstein also experienced this amazement that anything<br />

should exist at all. 58 In his Tractatus 59 he said, ‘It is not how things are in the<br />

world that is mystical, but that it exists’ (6.44). Admittedly Wittgenstein<br />

seems to contradict himself in his next proposition 6.45 where he talks of the<br />

mystical as seeing the world as a limited whole, which is surely a matter of<br />

how it is, rather than that it is. No doubt there are grades of mysticality!<br />

One way in which the question ‘Why is there anything at all?’ is quintessentially<br />

mystical is that it apparently has no possibility of an answer. Whatever<br />

answered it would have to be something in the world, or else something<br />

other than the world, <strong>and</strong> the question would just reappear over the existence<br />

of that other entity. However, we must not go too fast in ruling out all<br />

possibility of an answer. Some have sought the answer in the concept of<br />

a being whose existence is necessary. I shall conclude that indeed no answer on<br />

these lines is satisfactory, but nevertheless it is far from my purpose to dissuade<br />

anyone, including myself, from asking the unanswerable question.<br />

I do think that there is something ultimately mysterious in the fact that the<br />

universe exists at all, <strong>and</strong> that there is something wrong with us if we do not<br />

feel this mystery.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!