12.07.2013 Views

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Atheism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Theism</strong> 75<br />

105 See for example, C.A. Campbell, ‘Is “Freewill” a Pseudo-Problem?’, Mind,<br />

60 (1951), 441–65. For reference to controversy about this between Campbell<br />

<strong>and</strong> myself see J.J.C. Smart, Our Place in the Universe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989),<br />

ch. 6.<br />

106 See George Schlesinger, ‘The Problem of Evil <strong>and</strong> the Problem of Suffering’,<br />

American Philosophical Quarterly, 1 (1964), 244–7.<br />

107 Stuart Ross Taylor, Solar System Evolution: A New Perspective (Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press, 1992).<br />

108 Using somewhat different reasoning John D. Barrow <strong>and</strong> Frank J. Tipler have<br />

concluded that we are probably alone in our galaxy. Still, there are a lot of<br />

galaxies, <strong>and</strong> so we could be far from alone in the universe. See Barrow <strong>and</strong><br />

Tipler, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986),<br />

ch. 9.<br />

109 See E.L. Mascall, Christian Theology <strong>and</strong> Natural Science (London: Longman,<br />

Green, 1957), p. 43.<br />

110 John Hick, The Metaphor of God Incarnate (London: SCM Press, 1993), ch. 9.<br />

111 C.S. Lewis, Perel<strong>and</strong>ra (London: Bodley Head, 1967).<br />

112 Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, section 309.<br />

113 ‘Can God’s Existence be Disproved?’, in Antony Flew <strong>and</strong> Alasdair MacIntyre<br />

(eds), New Essays in Philosophical Theology (London: SCM Press, 1955).<br />

114 Reply to Hughes <strong>and</strong> Rainer in Flew <strong>and</strong> MacIntyre, op. cit. See also the<br />

original reply to Findlay by Rainer. Rainer thinks that we know God’s necessity<br />

by analogy <strong>and</strong> only God himself directly apprehends this. Findlay thinks that<br />

this is stretching the doctrine of analogy a bit far.<br />

115 Paul Davies, The Mind of God, p. 232.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!