12.07.2013 Views

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68 J.J.C. Smart<br />

systems might be common, those with a planet suitable for the evolution<br />

of intelligent life are extremely rare, <strong>and</strong> that the prospects of the current<br />

programme SETI (search for extraterrestrial intelligence) are very poor.<br />

This is probably to some extent a temperamental matter, because so much<br />

guesswork <strong>and</strong> quantifying of probably unquantifiable probabilities is involved,<br />

but I find it hard to believe that we are alone in the universe, or even in our<br />

galaxy. Even if the emergence of intelligent life is rare in the extreme, the<br />

number of galaxies is comparable to the number of stars in our Milky Way<br />

system. The reason I am inclined to believe that there is much other intelligent<br />

life in the universe (in which case a lot of it will be very advanced<br />

compared to ourselves) has to do with something like Leslie’s ‘firing squad’<br />

argument (see section 5) being at the back of my mind. Furthermore, the<br />

probability of intelligent life in the total universe of everything that there<br />

is would become a certainty if the universe were infinite or if there were<br />

infinitely many of Carter’s many universes, discussed in section 5.<br />

While not entirely closing our minds to the possibility that we are in fact<br />

alone in the universe let us look at the question of how the existence of life on<br />

other worlds would affect the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. Suppose<br />

(for the sake of argument) that there is an incarnation on ten million other<br />

planets. Does this mean that the Second Person of the Trinity is multiply<br />

incarnated? Or would the Trinity be a (ten million <strong>and</strong> one)-ity? As far as<br />

I have been able to discover the orthodox view (such as that of E.L. Mascall)<br />

would be to take the former alternative. 109 This is a hard matter which raises<br />

a lot of philosophical problems, but no more so, perhaps, than the original<br />

doctrine of incarnation itself.<br />

The problems that arise from the possibility of life on other worlds does<br />

seem to have been somewhat neglected by theologians. However, recently<br />

John Hick has considered the subject in his book The Metaphor of God<br />

Incarnate, Chapter 9, where he also refers to several other theological writers<br />

who have discussed the matter. 110 Hick’s theory is quite attractive, though<br />

conservative theologians might not like the notion of incarnation to be treated<br />

as metaphorical. A very odd way out was put forward, admittedly in the imaginative<br />

context of a fanciful novel, by C.S. Lewis. 111 This was that among<br />

countless other planets containing intelligent life ours is the only one on<br />

which its inhabitants sinned <strong>and</strong> so needed a Redeemer. One may find some<br />

difficulty in believing that our planet is the only one on which intelligent life<br />

exists, but it is far more difficult to believe that if there are millions of other<br />

planets containing intelligent life, ours is the only one in which sin existed.<br />

Even if intelligent life had existed for millions of years <strong>and</strong> evolved into<br />

angelically good beings they would have had to pass through the sinful stage<br />

in any evolutionary process that is at the least likely. As was explained on<br />

p. 60, unfortunate tendencies of character (such as combativeness) are likely

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!