Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism
Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism
Atheism and Theism JJ Haldane - Common Sense Atheism
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
232 J.J. <strong>Haldane</strong><br />
Such, then, are my disambiguated arguments for a ‘Prime Thinker’. As I said,<br />
I hope that others might feel there is enough in these lines of thought to<br />
pursue them further.<br />
5 Realism, Idealism, Anti-Realism <strong>and</strong> <strong>Theism</strong><br />
Throughout I have been concerned with the idea that features of reality call<br />
for explanation by reference to the hypothesis of divine creation. In the<br />
original exchange I also argued that the intelligibility of the world is paralleled<br />
by our capacity to comprehend it; that the harmony of cognition<br />
between thought <strong>and</strong> thing is to be explained in terms of a form of realism in<br />
which concepts are taken to be the natures of things transformed abstractly<br />
into the mind; <strong>and</strong> that our conceptual ability calls for a transcendent<br />
personal cause. In these several ways I have been reasoning from realist considerations<br />
to the existence of God.<br />
It has sometimes been suggested that there is a general connection between<br />
metaphysical realism <strong>and</strong> theism. By the former I mean the claim, to which<br />
Smart <strong>and</strong> I committed ourselves, namely ‘that there is a world independent<br />
of human thought <strong>and</strong> language which may yet be known through observation,<br />
hypothesis <strong>and</strong> reflection’ (p. 4). While I remain firmly attached to this<br />
view <strong>and</strong> will have more to say about it, I now wish to consider the contrasting<br />
position associated in the eighteenth century with Bishop Berkeley, <strong>and</strong><br />
in our own time with Michael Dummett, namely that theism is the conclusion<br />
one comes to in pursuing the anti-realist thought that the world is<br />
ultimately not something mind-independent.<br />
At first sight it is hard to believe that the following argument could be<br />
sound, be it that it is certainly valid:<br />
(1) Either realism or anti-realism.<br />
(2) If realism then theism.<br />
(3) If anti-realism then theism.<br />
(4) Therefore, theism.<br />
Superficially (1) may seem unproblematic. Surely realism <strong>and</strong> anti-realism<br />
are contradictories, so that they cannot both be true <strong>and</strong> they cannot both be<br />
false? On reflection, however, matters may not be so simple. I characterized<br />
realism as the view that the existence <strong>and</strong> structure of the world are independent<br />
of our conception of them. That being the case, anti-realism is to be<br />
understood as the denial of this. But exactly what is being denied? When the<br />
mediaevals disputed realism the matter at issue was the status of concepts <strong>and</strong><br />
universals. In this context the ‘realist’ is one who maintains that something