04.08.2013 Views

MoP - Ministry of Power

MoP - Ministry of Power

MoP - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196<br />

in just 9 meetings. Most SEBs/ Utilities had not adopted<br />

turnkey contracting, and had executed the works<br />

departmentally or on semi-turnkey basis; in some<br />

cases, the turnkey packaging was so distorted that it<br />

negated the concept <strong>of</strong> single point responsibility, which<br />

was the objective <strong>of</strong> turnkey contracting. In addition,<br />

the audit also detected numerous deficiencies in<br />

individual projects across different aspects, covering<br />

execution <strong>of</strong> out-<strong>of</strong>-scope items, lack <strong>of</strong> economy in<br />

procurement and execution, excess payments to<br />

contractors and other inefficiencies.<br />

There was lack <strong>of</strong> direct linkage between physical and<br />

financial progress <strong>of</strong> APDRP projects at the <strong>Ministry</strong>'s<br />

level. The mechanism for inspection <strong>of</strong> APDRP<br />

implementation was inadequate.<br />

MINISTRY OF POWER<br />

Audit Report No. 11 <strong>of</strong> 2007 (Regularity Audit)<br />

National Hydroelectric <strong>Power</strong> Corporation Limited<br />

Due to lack <strong>of</strong> proper coordination among its various<br />

divisions, the Company could not make the contractor liable<br />

for bearing the extra cost towards lowering the foundation<br />

level and had to make avoidable payment <strong>of</strong> Rs.1.06 crore<br />

to the contractor. (Para 14.1.1)<br />

NTPC Limited<br />

The Company made irregular payment <strong>of</strong> ex-gratia in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> special incentive amounting to Rs.116.88 crore to<br />

its employees whose wages/salary exceeded the limit<br />

stipulated under the Payment <strong>of</strong> Bonus Act. (Para 14.2.1)<br />

Due to continuing with two loans at higher rates <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

despite the downward trend in interest rates, the Company<br />

incurred extra expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs.4.72 crore till September<br />

2006 and incurred future liability <strong>of</strong> Rs.3.91 crore over the<br />

remaining tenure <strong>of</strong> loans. (Para 14.2.2)<br />

<strong>Power</strong> Finance Corporation Limited<br />

The Company sanctioned a loan to a private party<br />

without proper appraisal and adequate securities. As a<br />

result, an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.8.20 crore remained outstanding<br />

for more than three years, recovery <strong>of</strong> which was not<br />

assured. (Para 14.3.1)<br />

The Company signed a loan agreement with the Asian<br />

Development Bank for taking a loan <strong>of</strong> US$ 150 million. In<br />

view <strong>of</strong> the reluctance <strong>of</strong> the State Electricity Boards to utilise<br />

the loan, the Company foreclosed the loan to the extent <strong>of</strong><br />

US$ 100 million. Consequently, it had to incur an<br />

expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs.7.39 crore on payment <strong>of</strong> upfront fee<br />

and commitment charges. (Para 14.3.2)<br />

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES<br />

Audit Report No. 11 <strong>of</strong> 2007 (Regularity Audit)<br />

Airports Authority <strong>of</strong> India, Air India Limited,<br />

Northern Coalfields Limited, Coal India Limited,<br />

Export Credit Guarantee Corporation <strong>of</strong> India Limited, Food<br />

Corporation <strong>of</strong> India, The New India Assurance<br />

Company Limited, National Insurance Company Limited,<br />

United India Insurance Company Limited, The<br />

Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Oil and Natural Gas<br />

Corporation Limited, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation<br />

Limited and National Hydroelectric <strong>Power</strong> Corporation<br />

Limited .<br />

During test check in Audit, several cases relating to non<br />

billing, non receipt, short recovery, excess payment, undue<br />

benefit to private parties etc. in case <strong>of</strong> Central PSUs were<br />

pointed. In 21 such cases pertaining to 13 PSUs, where<br />

Audit pointed out an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.22 crore for recovery,<br />

the Management <strong>of</strong> the PSUs recovered an amount <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.15.52 crore during 2005-06.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!