MoP - Ministry of Power
MoP - Ministry of Power
MoP - Ministry of Power
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
196<br />
in just 9 meetings. Most SEBs/ Utilities had not adopted<br />
turnkey contracting, and had executed the works<br />
departmentally or on semi-turnkey basis; in some<br />
cases, the turnkey packaging was so distorted that it<br />
negated the concept <strong>of</strong> single point responsibility, which<br />
was the objective <strong>of</strong> turnkey contracting. In addition,<br />
the audit also detected numerous deficiencies in<br />
individual projects across different aspects, covering<br />
execution <strong>of</strong> out-<strong>of</strong>-scope items, lack <strong>of</strong> economy in<br />
procurement and execution, excess payments to<br />
contractors and other inefficiencies.<br />
There was lack <strong>of</strong> direct linkage between physical and<br />
financial progress <strong>of</strong> APDRP projects at the <strong>Ministry</strong>'s<br />
level. The mechanism for inspection <strong>of</strong> APDRP<br />
implementation was inadequate.<br />
MINISTRY OF POWER<br />
Audit Report No. 11 <strong>of</strong> 2007 (Regularity Audit)<br />
National Hydroelectric <strong>Power</strong> Corporation Limited<br />
Due to lack <strong>of</strong> proper coordination among its various<br />
divisions, the Company could not make the contractor liable<br />
for bearing the extra cost towards lowering the foundation<br />
level and had to make avoidable payment <strong>of</strong> Rs.1.06 crore<br />
to the contractor. (Para 14.1.1)<br />
NTPC Limited<br />
The Company made irregular payment <strong>of</strong> ex-gratia in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> special incentive amounting to Rs.116.88 crore to<br />
its employees whose wages/salary exceeded the limit<br />
stipulated under the Payment <strong>of</strong> Bonus Act. (Para 14.2.1)<br />
Due to continuing with two loans at higher rates <strong>of</strong> interest<br />
despite the downward trend in interest rates, the Company<br />
incurred extra expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs.4.72 crore till September<br />
2006 and incurred future liability <strong>of</strong> Rs.3.91 crore over the<br />
remaining tenure <strong>of</strong> loans. (Para 14.2.2)<br />
<strong>Power</strong> Finance Corporation Limited<br />
The Company sanctioned a loan to a private party<br />
without proper appraisal and adequate securities. As a<br />
result, an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.8.20 crore remained outstanding<br />
for more than three years, recovery <strong>of</strong> which was not<br />
assured. (Para 14.3.1)<br />
The Company signed a loan agreement with the Asian<br />
Development Bank for taking a loan <strong>of</strong> US$ 150 million. In<br />
view <strong>of</strong> the reluctance <strong>of</strong> the State Electricity Boards to utilise<br />
the loan, the Company foreclosed the loan to the extent <strong>of</strong><br />
US$ 100 million. Consequently, it had to incur an<br />
expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs.7.39 crore on payment <strong>of</strong> upfront fee<br />
and commitment charges. (Para 14.3.2)<br />
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES<br />
Audit Report No. 11 <strong>of</strong> 2007 (Regularity Audit)<br />
Airports Authority <strong>of</strong> India, Air India Limited,<br />
Northern Coalfields Limited, Coal India Limited,<br />
Export Credit Guarantee Corporation <strong>of</strong> India Limited, Food<br />
Corporation <strong>of</strong> India, The New India Assurance<br />
Company Limited, National Insurance Company Limited,<br />
United India Insurance Company Limited, The<br />
Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Oil and Natural Gas<br />
Corporation Limited, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation<br />
Limited and National Hydroelectric <strong>Power</strong> Corporation<br />
Limited .<br />
During test check in Audit, several cases relating to non<br />
billing, non receipt, short recovery, excess payment, undue<br />
benefit to private parties etc. in case <strong>of</strong> Central PSUs were<br />
pointed. In 21 such cases pertaining to 13 PSUs, where<br />
Audit pointed out an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs.22 crore for recovery,<br />
the Management <strong>of</strong> the PSUs recovered an amount <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs.15.52 crore during 2005-06.