Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Ring Theory and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(1) 1 41 ρ ∗ 2 4 ρ ∗ 1 a 2 a 1 c =⇒ a ∗ 2 a ∗ 1 c 2 b b 3 2 3 〈R〉 = 〈a 1 bc, a 2 bc〉〈R ′ 〉 = 〈a ∗ 1ρ ∗ 1+bc, a ∗ 2ρ ∗ 2+bc, a ∗ 1ρ ∗ 2, a ∗ 2ρ ∗ 1〉. (2) (i) 1 a 1 2 a 1 ❙ 2 2 3 a 1 ∗ a 1 3 a 3 =⇒ b 1 4 b 2 5 b 3 6 b 1 ∗ 4 ρ ❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙ ∗ 5 b 2 b 3 6 〈R〉 = 〈a 1 a 2 a 3 〉〈R ′ 〉 = 〈a 2 a 3 + a 1 ∗ ρ ∗ , b 1 ∗ ρ ∗ 〉. (ii) a 3 1 a 1 2 a 1 ❙ 2 2 3 a 1 ∗ a 1 3 a 3 =⇒ b 1 4 b 2 5 b 3 6 b 1 ∗ 4 ρ ❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙❙ ∗ 5 b 2 b 3 6 〈R〉 = 〈a 1 a 2 a 3 = b 1 b 2 b 3 〉〈R ′ 〉 = 〈a 2 a 3 + a 1 ∗ ρ ∗ , b 2 b 3 + b 1 ∗ ρ ∗ 〉. As examples show, we interpret <strong>the</strong> degree 1 arrows as relations. References [1] C. Amiot, S. Oppermann, Cluster equivalence and graded derived equivalence, preprint (2010), arXiv:1003.4916. [2] C. Amiot, S. Oppermann, Algebras <strong>of</strong> tame acyclic cluster type, preprint (2010), arXiv:1009.4065. [3] I. Assem, D. Simson, A. Skowroński, Elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Representation Theory <strong>of</strong> Associative Algebras. Vol. 1, London Ma<strong>the</strong>matical Society Student Texts 65, Cambridge university press (2006). [4] M. Auslander, M. I. Platzeck, I. Reiten, Coxeter functors without diagrams, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 250 (1979), 1–46. [5] I. N. Bernstein, I. M. Gelfand, V. A. Ponomarev, Coxeter functors and Gabriel’s <strong>the</strong>orem, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 28 (1973), no. 2(170), 19–33. [6] M. A. Bertani-Økland, S. Oppermann, Mutating loops and 2-cycles in 2-CY triangulated categories, J. Algebra 334 (2011), 195–218, [7] M. A. Bertani-Økland, S. Oppermann, A. Wrålsen, Graded mutation in cluster categories coming from hereditary categories with a tilting object, preprint (2010), arXiv:1009.4812. [8] S. Brenner, M. C. R. Butler, Generalisations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bernstein–Gelfand–Ponomarev reflection functors, in Proc. ICRA II (Ottawa,1979), Lecture Notes in Math. No. 832, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1980, pp. 103–69. [9] A. B. Buan, O. Iyama, I. Reiten, D. Smith, Mutation <strong>of</strong> cluster-tilting objects and potentials, Amer. J. Math. 133 (2011), no. 4, 835–887. [10] H. Derksen, J. Weyman, A. Zelevinsky, Quivers with potentials and <strong>the</strong>ir representations. I. Mutations, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 14 (2008), no. 1, 59–119. –119– a 3
[11] S. Fomin, A. Zelevinsky, Cluster algebras. I. Foundations, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), no. 2, 497–529 (electronic). [12] C. Geiss, B. Leclerc, J. Schröer, Rigid modules over preprojective algebras, Invent. Math. 165 (2006), no. 3, 589–632. [13] D. Happel, L. Unger Almost complete tilting modules, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 107 (1989), no. 3, 603–610. [14] M. Herschend, O. Iyama, Selfinjective quivers with potential and 2-representation-finite algebras, preprint (2010), arXiv:1006.1917. [15] O. Iyama, I. Reiten, Fomin-Zelevinsky mutation and tilting modules over Calabi-Yau algebras, Amer. J. Math. 130 (2008), no. 4, 1087–1149. [16] B. Keller, Deformed Calabi-Yau completions, preprint (2009), arXiv:0908.3499. [17] B. Keller, D. Yang, Derived equivalences from mutations <strong>of</strong> quivers with potential, Adv. Math. 226 (2011), no. 3, 2118–2168. [18] S. Ladkani, Perverse equivalences, BB-tilting, mutations and applications, preprint (2010), arXiv:1001.4765. [19] C. Riedtmann, A. Sch<strong>of</strong>ield, On a simplicial complex associated with tilting modules, Comment. Math. Helv.66 (1991), no. 1, 70–78. [20] H. Tachikawa, Self-injective algebras and tilting <strong>the</strong>ory, Representation <strong>the</strong>ory, I (Ottawa, Ont., 1984), 272–307, Lecture Notes in Math., 1177, Springer, Berlin, 1986. Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Ma<strong>the</strong>matics Nagoya University Frocho, Chikusaku, Nagoya 464-8602 Japan E-mail address: yuya.mizuno@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp –120–
Page 1:
Proceedings <stron
Page 5 and 6:
Organizing Committee of</st
Page 7 and 8:
Polycyclic codes and sequential cod
Page 9 and 10:
Preface The 44th <
Page 11 and 12:
8:40-9:30 Dan ZachariaSyracuse Univ
Page 13 and 14:
The 44th S
Page 15 and 16:
Tuesday September 27 8:40-9:30 Atsu
Page 17 and 18:
Conversely, let (T , F) be a stable
Page 19 and 20:
Then T = gen(X) and X is Ext-projec
Page 21 and 22:
DIMENSIONS OF DERIVED CATEGORIES TA
Page 23 and 24:
Notation 4. (1) Let A be an abelian
Page 25 and 26:
of finitely genera
Page 27 and 28:
is the map given b
Page 29 and 30:
(2) Let R be a commutative ring whi
Page 31 and 32:
QUIVER PRESENTATIONS OF GROTHENDIEC
Page 33 and 34:
Proposition 3. Let C be a category,
Page 35 and 36:
Example 11. Let Q be the</s
Page 37 and 38:
and Gr(X ′ ) is given by
Page 39 and 40:
particular, the de
Page 41 and 42:
Proposition 1 and 2 leave us with d
Page 43 and 44:
4. Examples Example 6. Let M = M(A
Page 45 and 46:
EXAMPLE OF CATEGORIFICATION OF A CL
Page 47 and 48:
The aim of <strong
Page 49 and 50:
X ∈ mod Π Q S 1 S 2 S 3 1 ❁
Page 51 and 52:
The previous proposition has a dual
Page 53 and 54:
Computing inductively all t
Page 55 and 56:
Example 23. We have ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
Page 57 and 58:
classification of
Page 59 and 60:
quiver Q over K, and let D b (H) <s
Page 61 and 62:
Then Q ∈ Q 17 . Suppose char K
Page 63 and 64:
Moreover the Hochs
Page 65 and 66:
DERIVED AUTOEQUIVALENCES AND BRAID
Page 67 and 68:
3. Periodic Twists We now describe
Page 69 and 70:
We now specialise to the</s
Page 71 and 72:
and τ − n := Ext n Λ(DΛ, −)
Page 73 and 74:
where r v ij := a i a j −a j a i
Page 75 and 76:
ON A DEGENERATION PROBLEM FOR COHEN
Page 77 and 78:
We make several othe</stron
Page 79 and 80:
Let A be a commutative Gorenstein r
Page 81 and 82:
3. Extended orders In the</
Page 83 and 84: WEAK GORENSTEIN DIMENSION FOR MODUL
Page 85 and 86: 1.2. Introduction. The notion <stro
Page 87 and 88: e 2 A z 1 −→ X → 0 in mod-A,
Page 89 and 90: 5. Gorenstein algebras In this sect
Page 91 and 92: ON Ω-PERFECT MODULES AND SEQUENCES
Page 93 and 94: when R is a Nakayama algebra <stron
Page 95 and 96: says that components of</st
Page 97 and 98: then we obtain a c
Page 99 and 100: Proposition 16. Let C s be a stable
Page 101 and 102: 3.1. ZD ∞ -components. We assume
Page 103 and 104: Theorem 26. Let R be a local artini
Page 105 and 106: where each f i is an irreducible ep
Page 107 and 108: QUANTUM UNIPOTENT SUBGROUP AND DUAL
Page 109 and 110: {F i } i∈I and q-Serre relations
Page 111 and 112: Theorem 8. (1)Let U − q (w) → U
Page 113 and 114: E-mail address: ykimura@kurims.kyot
Page 115 and 116: Indeed, (1, 2, 3, 4) {1,2} −−
Page 117 and 118: By comparing this the</stro
Page 119 and 120: (a) (b) Proposition 17. Let G be a
Page 121 and 122: POLYCYCLIC CODES AND SEQUENTIAL COD
Page 123 and 124: ⎛ ⎞ 0 0 c 0 1 c t D c = ⎜ 1
Page 125 and 126: References [1] D. Boucher and P. So
Page 127 and 128: 2. Dimension of tr
Page 129 and 130: APR TILTING MODULES AND QUIVER MUTA
Page 131 and 132: (1) Q ′ is a quiver obtained from
Page 133: 1 arrows of ˜µ L
Page 137 and 138: Theorem. Assume r is a common prime
Page 139 and 140: References [1] Apostol, T. M., The
Page 141 and 142: e(n, s) n = 6 7 8 s = 1 36 63 120 2
Page 143 and 144: Now we will show that the</
Page 145 and 146: is equal to ( n 2s−1 ); hence we
Page 147 and 148: THE NOETHERIAN PROPERTIES OF THE RI
Page 149 and 150: Proposition 4 (Paper III, Propositi
Page 151 and 152: HOCHSCHILD COHOMOLOGY OF QUIVER ALG
Page 153 and 154: (4) In [10], Green, Snashall and So
Page 155 and 156: 4. Quiver algebras defined by two c
Page 157 and 158: [6] L. Evens, The cohomology ring <
Page 159 and 160: Then there is an i
Page 161 and 162: • ( ˜F , ˜m) = ({ (1, 3), (2, 3
Page 163 and 164: Corollary 7 ([16, Theorem 3.4]). Th
Page 165 and 166: We have the direct
Page 167 and 168: We say a CW complex is regular, if
Page 169 and 170: SHARP BOUNDS FOR HILBERT COEFFICIEN
Page 171 and 172: Let us briefly note how this paper
Page 173 and 174: whence the set Λ
Page 175 and 176: Proof of</
Page 177 and 178: We have Q·H j m(A/(a 1 , a 2 , ·
Page 179 and 180: Let B = A/U(a d−1 ). We t
Page 181 and 182: • quiver Γ = (I, Ω) I Ω
Page 183 and 184: B = (B τ ) relations ρ 1 , · ·
Page 185 and 186:
Definition 1. double quiver ˜Γ p
Page 187 and 188:
◦ side Γ = (I, Ω) cycle (ac
Page 189 and 190:
Definition 6. n × n A(Γ Dyn ) =
Page 191 and 192:
(2) P Lie theory
Page 193 and 194:
Example 15. Γ loop quiver λ ∈
Page 195 and 196:
P (Γ)-module i-th radical B →
Page 197 and 198:
B ∈ Λ(d) ε ∗ i (B) := dim C
Page 199 and 200:
I-graded vector space V (d) (B τ )
Page 201 and 202:
A ∗(i) l (a) = ∑n+1 t=l+1 (a i,
Page 203 and 204:
wt(a) = (−d 1 , −d 2 , −d 3 )
Page 205 and 206:
Ω Q Ω ( B Ω ; wt, ε i , ϕ
Page 207 and 208:
“Λ(d) G(d)-” Definition 25.
Page 209 and 210:
(( ( ) ( ) 0 s 0 0 0 , , , s) ( u 0
Page 211 and 212:
MATRIX FACTORIZATIONS, ORBIFOLD CUR
Page 213 and 214:
( ∂f Jac(f t t ) := C[x 1 , . . .
Page 215 and 216:
Definition 14. CM L f (R f ) Ob(C
Page 217 and 218:
4. Dolgachev Proposition 24 ([1]
Page 219 and 220:
✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤ γ 1 +γ 2
Page 221 and 222:
(f, G f ) Dolgachev A Gf f Berg
Page 223 and 224:
ON A GENERALIZATION OF COSTABLE TOR
Page 225 and 226:
(2) P/t(P ) is σ-projective for an
Page 227 and 228:
(3) P is a maximal σ-coessential e
Page 229 and 230:
(2)→(1): Let σ be epi-preserving
Page 231 and 232:
GRADED FROBENIUS ALGEBRAS AND QUANT
Page 233 and 234:
Definition 2. A graded algebra A is
Page 235 and 236:
In this case, ν ∈ Aut k E induce
Page 237 and 238:
References [1] X. W. Chen, Graded s
Page 239 and 240:
The topics covered are ring-<strong
Page 241 and 242:
(2.3) soc( R R) ∼ = k⊕ s i T i
Page 243 and 244:
principal ideal Rr ⊂ ker ϖ. Thus
Page 245 and 246:
By Example 3, the
Page 247 and 248:
weight wt(x) = d(x, 0) of</
Page 249 and 250:
4.1. Fourier Transform. Gleason’s
Page 251 and 252:
5. The Extension Problem In this se
Page 253 and 254:
Because R is assumed to be Frobeniu
Page 255 and 256:
is injective for every finite left
Page 257 and 258:
linear code defined by η;
Page 259 and 260:
ψ : ε(A) → Â. In this way, C
Page 261 and 262:
REALIZING STABLE CATEGORIES AS DERI
Page 263 and 264:
2.1. Positively graded self-injecti
Page 265 and 266:
By the above resul
Page 267 and 268:
Next we consider the</stron
Page 269 and 270:
(2) There exists a triangle-equival
Page 271 and 272:
ALGEBRAIC STRATIFICATIONS OF DERIVE
Page 273 and 274:
The leaves of <str
Page 275 and 276:
Step 2: Let A be a finite-dimension
Page 277 and 278:
RECOLLEMENTS GENERATED BY IDEMPOTEN
Page 279 and 280:
(a) the adjoint tr
Page 281 and 282:
Cluster-tilting the</strong
Page 283 and 284:
INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEO
Page 285 and 286:
is exact. Since E n ∼ = En+r , Mi
Page 287 and 288:
field of V . We de
Page 289 and 290:
(Proof) ( ) p 0 0
Page 291 and 292:
we have a sequence of</stro
Page 293 and 294:
R : CM(R⊗ k V ) → CM(R) defined
Page 295 and 296:
P = P ′ t by t is a projective R
Page 297 and 298:
SUBCATEGORIES OF EXTENSION MODULES
Page 299 and 300:
Lemma 6. Let S 1 and S 2 be Serre s
Page 301 and 302:
In the first row <
show all

Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Ring Theory and ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?