20.04.2014 Views

Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Ring Theory and ...

Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Ring Theory and ...

Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Ring Theory and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The leaves <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> tree are <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> simple factors <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> stratificati<strong>on</strong>. The following questi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

are basic:<br />

(a) Does every derived module category admit a finite algebraic stratificati<strong>on</strong>?<br />

(b) Do two finite algebraic stratificati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a derived module category have <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same<br />

number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> simple factors? Do <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y have <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same simple factors (up to triangle<br />

equivalence <strong>and</strong> up to reordering)?<br />

(c) Which derived module categories occur as simple factors <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some algebraic stratificati<strong>on</strong>s?<br />

The questi<strong>on</strong> (c) will be discussed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> next secti<strong>on</strong>. The questi<strong>on</strong>s (a) <strong>and</strong> (b) ask for<br />

a Jordan–Hölder type result for derived module categories. For general (possibly infinitedimensi<strong>on</strong>al)<br />

algebras <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> answers are negative. Below we give some (counter-)examples.<br />

Example 2. ([2]) Let A = ∏ N<br />

k. Then D(A) does not admit a finite algebraic stratificati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Example 3. ([6]) Let A be as in Example 1. Let V be a regular simple A-module, namely,<br />

V corresp<strong>on</strong>ds to <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> following representati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kr<strong>on</strong>ecker quiver<br />

k<br />

1 <br />

λ<br />

k (λ ∈ k),<br />

k<br />

0 <br />

1<br />

k .<br />

Let ϕ : A → A V be <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> corresp<strong>on</strong>ding universal localisati<strong>on</strong>. Then T = A ⊕ A V /ϕ(A) is<br />

an (infinitely generated) tilting A-module. We refer to [6] for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unexplained noti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Let B = End A (T ). Then <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are two algebraic stratificati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> D(B) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> length 3 <strong>and</strong><br />

2 respectively :<br />

D(B)<br />

D(B)<br />

<br />

D(k (t ))<br />

❍ ❍❍❍❍❍❍ ❍<br />

D(A)<br />

● ●●●●● ●<br />

✉ ✉✉✉✉✉✉✉✉<br />

D(k[t])<br />

❏ ❏❏❏❏❏❏ ❏ ❏<br />

D(k [t])<br />

✈ ✈✈✈✈✈✈✈✈<br />

D(k)<br />

●<br />

D(k)<br />

Examples <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this type are systematically studied in [7].<br />

Notice that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> algebra B in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> preceding example is infinite-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al. For finitedimensi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

algebras, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> questi<strong>on</strong>s (a) <strong>and</strong> (b) are open. For piecewise hereditary algebras<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> answers to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m are positive. Recall that a finite-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al algebra is piecewise<br />

hereditary if it is derived equivalent to a hereditary abelian category.<br />

Theorem 4. ([1, 3]) Let A be a piecewise hereditary algebra. Then any algebraic stratificati<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> D(A) has <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same set (with multiplicities) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> simple factors: <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are precisely<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> derived categories <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> endomorphism algebras <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> simple A-modules.<br />

–258–

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!