05.11.2012 Views

turkish phonology and morphology (türkçe ses ve b‹ç‹mb‹lg‹s‹)

turkish phonology and morphology (türkçe ses ve b‹ç‹mb‹lg‹s‹)

turkish phonology and morphology (türkçe ses ve b‹ç‹mb‹lg‹s‹)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

110<br />

Figure 7.1<br />

Table 7.2<br />

O<strong>ve</strong>rlap in Time<br />

Reference<br />

Turkish Phonology <strong>and</strong> Morphology (Türkçe Ses <strong>ve</strong> Biçim Bilgisi)<br />

about the internal temporal structure of a <strong>ve</strong>rb is called lexical aspect. Howe<strong>ve</strong>r,<br />

regardless of this lexical make-up of a <strong>ve</strong>rb, the time frame expressed by it can be<br />

manipulated by using tense <strong>and</strong> aspect markers in a language. Tense is a<br />

grammatical category that locates the e<strong>ve</strong>nt in time. Time, as we know it, indicates<br />

a temporal dimension, <strong>and</strong> it is linear. When we speak, we choose a point in time<br />

from which e<strong>ve</strong>nts are viewed. This point in time is our reference point <strong>and</strong><br />

tense is used to locate e<strong>ve</strong>nts in time with respect to that point. Most<br />

characteristically, the moment of speech is chosen to be the reference point. An<br />

e<strong>ve</strong>nt may take place anterior to the reference point, it can include the reference<br />

point, or it can be posterior to the reference point as shown below:<br />

X<br />

TIME LINE<br />

X X<br />

e<strong>ve</strong>nt reference point<br />

(=the moment of speech)<br />

X<br />

e<strong>ve</strong>nt<br />

e<strong>ve</strong>nt<br />

This way of viewing e<strong>ve</strong>nts gi<strong>ve</strong>s us three tense distinctions: past, present, <strong>and</strong><br />

future. Howe<strong>ve</strong>r, this terminology may sometimes be misleading since past markers<br />

may be used in non-past situations <strong>and</strong> present markers in se<strong>ve</strong>ral others. Some<br />

examples from Turkish are gi<strong>ve</strong>n in Table 7.2.<br />

past meaning present meaning future meaning<br />

past marker Vaktiniz var m›yd›? Haydi, ben gittim!<br />

present marker Çocuk bafl›n› kald›r›r<br />

<strong>ve</strong> yafll› adam bakar.<br />

Yar›n gelirim.<br />

progressi<strong>ve</strong> marker Annesi sabahlara kadar<br />

ders çal›flt›¤›n› söylüyor<br />

Yar›n gidiyoruz.<br />

As can be seen in the abo<strong>ve</strong> table, only primary meanings of these markers<br />

coincide with their labels. Therefore, it is important to keep in mind that the label<br />

used to represent a tense category is not necesarily associated with only this meaning.<br />

Therefore, some grammarians prefer using a two-way distinction as past vs non-past<br />

instead of the more traditional three-way distinction past vs present vs future.<br />

Another feature to note about tense is that it is a deictic category. The<br />

interpretation of tense is relati<strong>ve</strong> to the time of utterence. An e<strong>ve</strong>nt that took place<br />

in 1923 is viewed as past today because our reference point for this interpretation<br />

is 2004. We are looking at this e<strong>ve</strong>nt from the year 2004. 1923 is anterior to 2004;<br />

therefore, an e<strong>ve</strong>nt in it is past. Howe<strong>ve</strong>r, the same e<strong>ve</strong>nt was viewed as present<br />

in 1923, or e<strong>ve</strong>n future in 1922. So, tense is determined on the basis of the reference<br />

time. When this time changes, the temporal interpretation of the e<strong>ve</strong>nt also changes.<br />

Aspect, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, is not a deictic category. It does not locate e<strong>ve</strong>nts<br />

on a time frame; therefore, it does not select a reference point to describe e<strong>ve</strong>nts.<br />

Rather, it con<strong>ve</strong>ys information about the nature of the e<strong>ve</strong>nt. That is, the way in<br />

which the e<strong>ve</strong>nt occurs in time: Is it continuous? Is it a one-time e<strong>ve</strong>nt; <strong>and</strong> therefore,<br />

semalfacti<strong>ve</strong>? Does it invol<strong>ve</strong> multiple repetitions of a seriees of sub-e<strong>ve</strong>nts; <strong>and</strong><br />

therefore, iterati<strong>ve</strong>? Is the e<strong>ve</strong>nt completed (perfecti<strong>ve</strong>), or left open (imperfecti<strong>ve</strong>)?<br />

etc. This kind of characterization does not affect the time of the clause.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!