turkish phonology and morphology (türkçe ses ve b‹ç‹mb‹lg‹s‹)

Adal›, O. (1979). Türkiye Türkçesinde
biçimbirimler. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yay›nlar›.
Aksan, D. (2000). Her yönüyle dil. Ankara: TDK.
____. (2000). En eski Türkçenin izlerinde. ‹stanbul:
Simurg.
Birsel, S. (1969). Kendimle Konuflmalar. Ankara:
Papirus.
Bloomfield, L. (1976). Language. London: George
Allen& Unwin Ltd.
Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Demircan, Ö. (1977). Türkiye Türkçesinde kök-ek
birleflmeleri. Ankara: TDK.
Dilaçar, A (1971). Gramer: Tan›m›, ad› kapsam›, türleri,
yöntemi, e¤itimdeki yeri ve tarihçesi. TDAYB, 83-
145.
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Some Universals of grammar
with particular reference to the order of meaningful
elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals
of Grammar, 73-113. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Haiman, J. (1983) Iconic and economic motivation.
Language 59. 781-819.
Hatibo¤lu, V. (1981). Türkçenin ekleri. Ankara: TDK.
‹mer, K. (1976). Türkiye Türkçesinde kökler. Ankara:
TDK.
Katamba, F. (1993). Morphology. London: Macmillan
Press.
Kornfilt, J. (1990). Turkish and the Turkic Languages. In
B. Comrie (Ed.), The World’s Major Languages
(pp: 619-644). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. New York: Routlege.
Mungan, G. (2002). Türkçede fiillerden türetilmifl
isimlerin morfolojik ve semantik yönden
incelenmesi: ‹stanbul: Simurg.
Sapir, E.(1921). Language. London: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich.
Tietze, A. (2002). Tarihi ve etimolojik Türkiye
Türkçesi lugat›. ‹stanbul: Simurg.
Türkeli, N. (1995). Varoflta kad›n olmak. ‹stanbul:
Gökkufla¤›.
Unit 5 - Morphology: The Wordland
References & Bibliography End Notes
75
1. Capital letters which are used in suffixes represent
the abstract symbols of the sounds in these
morphemes. The real phonetic specification of
these abstract symbols are subject to vowel and
consonant harmony rules in Turkish. Therefore -
E/-A of the morpheme -lAn signals a two-way vowel
harmony offering a choice between /e/as in evlen
or /a/as in yafllan depending on the phonological
environment. Similarly, -I signals a four-way vowel
harmony among /›/, /i/, /u/ and /ü/ (see Unit 4,
Vowel Harmony). Consonants follow a similar
pattern. -D, for example, can be realized as either
/t/ or /d/; -K as either /k/ or /g/ and so on (see
Unit 4, Voicing Assimilation).
2. It should also be noted that every instance of a
form does not necessarily claim to be a morpheme.
For example, /a/ in ad, sat and oda is not even a
morpheme.
3. Ungrammaticality will be marked with (*)
henceforth.
4. A symbol in paranthesis means that it is used
conditionally. For example, -y- appears in the
environment of a preceding wowel: temizle-y-ici
but sür-ücü.
5. One exception to this is -ki as in evdekiler.