National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
114 ai r p o w e r in 20 t H Ce n t u ry do C t r i n e s a n d em p l o y m e n t - nat i o n a l ex p e r i e n C e s<br />
A long detailed and highly enthusiastic report on Italian aviation, and especially<br />
its strategic bombing campaign, written by Capt.-Commandant Lebon of the Technical<br />
Branch of the Belgian Air Service, was <strong>for</strong>warded to Trenchard in October 1917.<br />
Lebon wrote admiringly and at length of “crushing” attacks on Austrian targets by 30<br />
and 40 Capronis at a time, enthused about the potential of the Caproni triplane, and<br />
concluded by saying that in the field of strategic bombing the Italians “are far ahead<br />
of all other nations”.<br />
Moreover, referring to the summer of 1918, Baring later recalled (significantly<br />
I think) that: “During this period we had a great deal to do with the American, the<br />
French and the Italian aviation. The Italians had a Squadron of Caproni machines<br />
quite close to us”. And finally, Caproni - accompanied by his friend Eugenio Chiesa,<br />
the Italian <strong>Commission</strong>er <strong>for</strong> Aviation - actually visited Trenchard at his HQ in<br />
France in 1918. Could the influence of Caproni explain both Trenchard’s insistence<br />
on the need <strong>for</strong> the bombing of enemy airfields to achieve air superiority be<strong>for</strong>e a<br />
strategic bombing campaign could properly begin, and also Trenchard’s insistence<br />
that the morale of the enemy civil population should be the main target of a strategic<br />
bombing campaign? (Trenchard’s insistence on those points stayed with him, undiminished,<br />
throughout his life).<br />
Furthermore, given the testimony of Hoare, is it really likely that in the 20s<br />
Trenchard was totally unaware of Douhet’s ideas? As shown below, Trenchard was<br />
certainly aware of Douhet by 1928. Is it in fact credible that the very close similarity<br />
between the ideas of Trenchard and Douhet was (as Higham says) mere coincidence?<br />
I consider the evidence indisputable that, right from the earliest days, a close<br />
international aeronautical community existed; and that, even in the earliest days, its<br />
members had frequent opportunities to meet each other and to exchange in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
and ideas. At the outset it should be remembered that, ever since the mid-nineteenth<br />
century, each major nation had serving officers attached to its Embassies abroad - including,<br />
eventually, Air Attaches. And, at the risk of stating the obvious, the primary<br />
task of such officers was to familiarise themselves with the armed <strong>for</strong>ces of the country<br />
in which they were serving, and to keep the authorities back in their own country<br />
in<strong>for</strong>med of any developments.<br />
Following the Wright brother’s sensational tour of Europe in 1908-9, air displays,<br />
competitions and conferences became a regular part of the aviation scene. And by<br />
the 20s, such events had become institutionalised. Among the many air displays,<br />
the one held annually at Hendon was one of the most famous; and among the many<br />
competitions, one automatically thinks of the headline-making Schneider Trophy<br />
contests e.g. the one at Venice, hosted by Balbo and Andriani, in 1927. Of the many<br />
Aviation Congresses and Conferences, the ones held in Rome in October 1923 - presided<br />
over by our old friend Mercanti, then Italian <strong>Commission</strong>er <strong>for</strong> Civil Aviation<br />
- and October 1927 were among the most notable.<br />
WWI was responsible <strong>for</strong> bringing French, Italian, <strong>British</strong> and US aviation closer