06.01.2013 Views

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

298 ai r p o w e r in 20 t H Ce n t u ry do C t r i n e s a n d em p l o y m e n t - nat i o n a l ex p e r i e n C e s<br />

During these years of shift of Air doctrine the Swedish Air Force also steadily<br />

grew in number. In 1945 the Air Force consisted of 17 wings, seven bombers, seven<br />

fighters and three reconnaissance, and every unit had more, and also more modern,<br />

planes than in 1939. The CIC Bengt Nordenskiöld could muster a little more than<br />

1 000 planes when the war ended in Europe in May 1945.<br />

The changes in the Swedish Air Force doctrine in the years after 1936 was partly<br />

due to technical changes, partly to experiences of the war since 1939. In the first<br />

years of the 1940´s there wasn´t, of course, any realistic possibilities <strong>for</strong> the Swedish<br />

bomber wings to attack the Soviet or German air bases, not to speak about attacking<br />

Soviet or German cities in order to prevent attacks against similar targets in Sweden.<br />

The thought of using bombers to prevent bombing of Swedish cities and industries<br />

was already history.<br />

Instead the bomber wing should be used the enemy invasionfleet or army units<br />

crossing the Swedish border. However, in the dramatic morning of June 22, 1941,<br />

when Nazi-Germany launched it´s massive invasion of Soviet Russia, bombers of<br />

the 1st bomber wing at Västerås air base were put on alert. In case of a Soviet attack<br />

their task would have been to try to attack invasions ships and, if possible, harbours<br />

in the Sovietockupied Estonia. 15<br />

A defence commission suggested in 1941 the establishment of as many fighter<br />

wings as bomber wings (six of each), and it argued <strong>for</strong> a closer cooperation between<br />

the Air Force, the Army and the Navy: “The fighter units shall have enough capacity<br />

to make an efficient protection <strong>for</strong> the own air <strong>for</strong>ces in the air and on the ground,<br />

the army <strong>for</strong>ces and their communications, the naval <strong>for</strong>ces in harbour and close to<br />

the coasts and, finally, to the populated areas. These units are, together with mobile<br />

troops, the most important weapon against an enemy invasion.”<br />

This was postulated in January 1942 and marks the end of the bomber epoch<br />

in Swedish Air Force doctrine. The attempts by the Air Force to create a kind of<br />

strategic bomber <strong>for</strong>ce came to an end, and instead the Force began to develop tactical<br />

bombers (<strong>for</strong> CAS-missions), fighters and the new attack planes, light and fast<br />

planes aimed <strong>for</strong> attacking the invasion fleet. This shift in the doctrine also ment that<br />

the Air Force came to work more close to the other two branches of the armed <strong>for</strong>ces.<br />

A strong strategic bomber <strong>for</strong>ce could operate more independent than the tactical<br />

and attack <strong>for</strong>ces that now began to dominate the agenda. The most clear expression<br />

<strong>for</strong> this shift in doctrine was the creation of the “Attack squadron”, the main mobile<br />

striking tool to be used by the CIC of the armed <strong>for</strong>ces in case on an enemy invasion<br />

throughout the cold war.<br />

15 Lars Ericson (Wolke), Buffert eller hot? De baltiska staterna i svensk militär planering år 1941 (In<br />

English: Buffert or threat? The Baltic states in Swedish military planning in 1941), in Bo Hugemark,<br />

ed., I orkanens öga. 1941 – osäker neutralitet (In English: In the eye of the hurricane. 1941 – uncertain<br />

neutrality), Stockholm 1992 pp. 127-154, especially pp. 138-141.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!