National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
298 ai r p o w e r in 20 t H Ce n t u ry do C t r i n e s a n d em p l o y m e n t - nat i o n a l ex p e r i e n C e s<br />
During these years of shift of Air doctrine the Swedish Air Force also steadily<br />
grew in number. In 1945 the Air Force consisted of 17 wings, seven bombers, seven<br />
fighters and three reconnaissance, and every unit had more, and also more modern,<br />
planes than in 1939. The CIC Bengt Nordenskiöld could muster a little more than<br />
1 000 planes when the war ended in Europe in May 1945.<br />
The changes in the Swedish Air Force doctrine in the years after 1936 was partly<br />
due to technical changes, partly to experiences of the war since 1939. In the first<br />
years of the 1940´s there wasn´t, of course, any realistic possibilities <strong>for</strong> the Swedish<br />
bomber wings to attack the Soviet or German air bases, not to speak about attacking<br />
Soviet or German cities in order to prevent attacks against similar targets in Sweden.<br />
The thought of using bombers to prevent bombing of Swedish cities and industries<br />
was already history.<br />
Instead the bomber wing should be used the enemy invasionfleet or army units<br />
crossing the Swedish border. However, in the dramatic morning of June 22, 1941,<br />
when Nazi-Germany launched it´s massive invasion of Soviet Russia, bombers of<br />
the 1st bomber wing at Västerås air base were put on alert. In case of a Soviet attack<br />
their task would have been to try to attack invasions ships and, if possible, harbours<br />
in the Sovietockupied Estonia. 15<br />
A defence commission suggested in 1941 the establishment of as many fighter<br />
wings as bomber wings (six of each), and it argued <strong>for</strong> a closer cooperation between<br />
the Air Force, the Army and the Navy: “The fighter units shall have enough capacity<br />
to make an efficient protection <strong>for</strong> the own air <strong>for</strong>ces in the air and on the ground,<br />
the army <strong>for</strong>ces and their communications, the naval <strong>for</strong>ces in harbour and close to<br />
the coasts and, finally, to the populated areas. These units are, together with mobile<br />
troops, the most important weapon against an enemy invasion.”<br />
This was postulated in January 1942 and marks the end of the bomber epoch<br />
in Swedish Air Force doctrine. The attempts by the Air Force to create a kind of<br />
strategic bomber <strong>for</strong>ce came to an end, and instead the Force began to develop tactical<br />
bombers (<strong>for</strong> CAS-missions), fighters and the new attack planes, light and fast<br />
planes aimed <strong>for</strong> attacking the invasion fleet. This shift in the doctrine also ment that<br />
the Air Force came to work more close to the other two branches of the armed <strong>for</strong>ces.<br />
A strong strategic bomber <strong>for</strong>ce could operate more independent than the tactical<br />
and attack <strong>for</strong>ces that now began to dominate the agenda. The most clear expression<br />
<strong>for</strong> this shift in doctrine was the creation of the “Attack squadron”, the main mobile<br />
striking tool to be used by the CIC of the armed <strong>for</strong>ces in case on an enemy invasion<br />
throughout the cold war.<br />
15 Lars Ericson (Wolke), Buffert eller hot? De baltiska staterna i svensk militär planering år 1941 (In<br />
English: Buffert or threat? The Baltic states in Swedish military planning in 1941), in Bo Hugemark,<br />
ed., I orkanens öga. 1941 – osäker neutralitet (In English: In the eye of the hurricane. 1941 – uncertain<br />
neutrality), Stockholm 1992 pp. 127-154, especially pp. 138-141.