National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
64 ai r p o w e r in 20 t H Ce n t u ry do C t r i n e s a n d em p l o y m e n t - nat i o n a l ex p e r i e n C e s<br />
situation in the theatre of war. The principles <strong>for</strong> using offensive air power would<br />
be very similar to those mentioned earlier. Interdiction operations, 26 which meant<br />
constant and concentrated attacks on transportation targets, would be aimed at<br />
depriving the enemy of his freedom of movement. The intensive air offensive would<br />
limit the opponent’s options <strong>for</strong> transferring strategic or tactical reserves into the<br />
combat zone. During the preparatory phase, while the invasion <strong>for</strong>ce was loading and<br />
at sea, the air <strong>for</strong>ce was to concentrate its ef<strong>for</strong>ts on the area around the landing area,<br />
striking targets such as the landing beaches or tactical reserves. In the final phase the<br />
main task of the air <strong>for</strong>ce would be to neutralise the local defences and to isolate the<br />
beachhead. The role of the air <strong>for</strong>ce would be emphasised during the assault phase<br />
due to the army’s lack of long-range weapon systems. The air <strong>for</strong>ce would there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
make a general exception to the rule that aircraft should not be assigned to directly<br />
support the ground <strong>for</strong>ces. In practice, this would mean using ground attack planes in<br />
close air support tasks such as neutralization of the beach defences, help <strong>for</strong> assault<br />
troops involved in close-range fighting <strong>for</strong> the bridgehead, and transport support by<br />
dropping or carrying supplies to the bridgehead. 27<br />
If the landings were to take place outside the effective range of Royal Air<br />
Force bases as they partially did in 1956, the assault carrier groups would assume<br />
a more important role. The principles involved in employing carrier-borne aircraft<br />
were not radically different from those <strong>for</strong> land-based units. The concentration of<br />
air ef<strong>for</strong>t was the governing principle <strong>for</strong> employing carrier-borne aircraft as well.<br />
The combined <strong>for</strong>ce of all aircraft carriers belonging to the assault group was to be<br />
used simultaneously. However, the reason <strong>for</strong> this mainly stemmed from maritime<br />
requirements such as the protection of the carrier group, which required complex<br />
manoeuvres by the destroyers in the anti-submarine screen. 28<br />
In an ideal scenario, a relatively vulnerable carrier group <strong>for</strong>ce would be used<br />
only after the enemy air <strong>for</strong>ce was depleted by a strategic air offensive. Otherwise,<br />
a Carrier Group Commander would be compelled to allocation a large proportion of<br />
his air ef<strong>for</strong>t to protecting the carrier <strong>for</strong>ce from the hostile air <strong>for</strong>ce. When this factor<br />
was combined with unpredictable weather and the requirement to replenish supplies<br />
approximately every five days, the carrier air ef<strong>for</strong>t could be significantly reduced. 29<br />
The employment of Fleet Air Arm squadrons could not compensate <strong>for</strong> the<br />
26<br />
Interdiction was defined as “the disruption of the enemy’s communication system with the object of<br />
restricting his powers of movement”, A Precis of Lectures by the Land/Air Warfare Training Team,<br />
Northern Army Group, 2nd Allied Tactical Air Force (Stationary Service RAOC, BAOR, 1953), p. 2.<br />
27<br />
Amphibious Warfare Handbook No.8 A, The Employment of Air Forces in Amphibious Warfare,<br />
1952. (Admirality No. CB4555, 1952), pp. 2-4.<br />
28<br />
Amphibious Warfare Handbook No.8 A, The Employment of Air Forces in Amphibious Warfare, pp.<br />
8-9.<br />
29<br />
Amphibious Warfare Handbook No.8 A, The Employment of Air Forces in Amphibious Warfare, pp.<br />
10-11.