06.01.2013 Views

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 ai r p o w e r in 20 t H Ce n t u ry do C t r i n e s a n d em p l o y m e n t - nat i o n a l ex p e r i e n C e s<br />

A Safe and Familiar Approach – First Plans<br />

Egyptian nationalisation of the Suez Canal on 26 July 1956 took the <strong>British</strong> by<br />

surprise. Although the <strong>British</strong> had anticipated this option as a possibility in Limited<br />

War scenarios produced by the Joint Planning Staff only two weeks be<strong>for</strong>e the actual<br />

nationalisation took place, the nationalisation was a genuine coup de main by Nasser.<br />

The Joint Planning Staff and subsequently the Chiefs of Staff Committee concluded<br />

that some 20 squadrons of Royal Air Force would be required to neutralise the<br />

Egyptian Air Force and to support subsequent land operations including an airborne<br />

operation. A large naval task <strong>for</strong>ce including three aircraft carriers and all serviceable<br />

amphibious vessels would be necessary implement a maritime blockade, to destroy<br />

the Egyptian Navy and to conduct seaborne landings of sufficient size at Port Said.<br />

The army would have to concentrate three divisions, a large pool of supporting units<br />

and the sole parachute brigade group. 35<br />

The Joint Planning Staff produced the first outline plan within days of the<br />

nationalisation. According to the plan the Royal Air Force was to execute two of<br />

its contingency plans to concentrate several light bomber squadrons and air defence<br />

squadrons to Cyprus. The Mediterranean Fleet was to be rein<strong>for</strong>ced by two carriers<br />

and a large army element of several <strong>for</strong>mations was to be assembled. Six weeks were<br />

needed to make the necessary preparations <strong>for</strong> the attack. 36<br />

The Joint Planning Staff also briefly considered the feasibility of using air power<br />

only to suppress the Egyptian defences and to unseat the Egyptian Government as<br />

tasked by the Chiefs of Staff Committee. 37 However, according the Joint Planning<br />

Staff, “there would be a danger of not achieving the aim by bombing alone and of a<br />

hiatus occurring there<strong>for</strong>e other <strong>for</strong>ces could be brought to bear against Egypt”. The<br />

plan included three phases:<br />

1. Preliminary move of the attacking <strong>for</strong>ces within striking distance of Egypt,<br />

mainly Cyprus, Malta and Libya<br />

2. Maritime blockade and air action<br />

3. Assault on the northern end of the Suez Canal (Port Said) and a diversionary<br />

threat against Alexandria. 38<br />

The first plan did not have time to mature from a concept into a serious plan be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

it was rejected by the Task Force Commanders. They considered that an amphibious<br />

landing at Port Said, which is at northern entrance of the Canal, was not tactically<br />

feasible. Instead, the <strong>for</strong>ce was to land at Alexandria which had a much better port<br />

than Port Said. As a result, the land <strong>for</strong>ce –equivalent of four divisions – could be<br />

35<br />

NA DEFE 6/36, JP (56) 125, 18 July 1956, ”Forces <strong>for</strong> Limited War”.<br />

36<br />

NA DEFE 4/89, JP (56), 29 July 1956 “Availability of Forces <strong>for</strong> Action Against Egypt”.<br />

37 th NA DEFE 4/89, COS (56) 74 Meeting, 30 July 1956.<br />

38<br />

NA DEFE 6/37, JP (56) 31 July 1956, “Action Against Egypt, Outline Plan”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!