06.01.2013 Views

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e t w e e n “do u h e t I s m” A n d “cl o s e AIr su p p o rt”. th e ge r m A n AIr wA r do c t r I n e In wo r l d wA r II 95<br />

strong air <strong>for</strong>ce as an independent Service.<br />

An air <strong>for</strong>ce equipped with approximately 390 long-range, four-engine bombers<br />

with a capacity of 2000 kg of explosive, incendiary and gas bombs – the latter had by<br />

the way already been demanded by Douhet – would reduce the enemy’s eagerness to<br />

attack since by means of such aircraft a war could immediately be conducted in his<br />

own center. Furthermore, the memorandum read: “Inflicting bomb terror on enemy<br />

capitals or industrial areas will result in moral collapse the faster the weaker the<br />

national attitude of the people and the more the metropolitan masses are oriented towards<br />

materialism and divided by social and political conflicts”. To gain Germany’s<br />

air superiority in Central Europe as fast as possible, Knauss recommended that the<br />

air <strong>for</strong>ce be augmented at the expense of naval armaments projects; after all, an air<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce equipped with 400 “large bomber aircraft” could be built with the means required<br />

<strong>for</strong> the construction of two armored cruisers. In addition to bomber aircraft,<br />

Knauss also demanded reconnaissance aircraft while fighter aircraft, in his opinion,<br />

had no operational functions; he assigned them only operations in support of army<br />

and naval <strong>for</strong>ces.<br />

This was clear evidence of the influence of Douhet’s doctrine, but Reich Minister<br />

of War Werner v. Blomberg, in a directive dating 16 August 1933, pointed out that he<br />

by no means intended to set up a “strategic air <strong>for</strong>ce”. The aim rather was to set up an<br />

“operational air <strong>for</strong>ce” that in the event of a European multi-front war would have to<br />

assume operational functions as part of a comprehensive strategy, either acting on its<br />

own supported by patrol aircraft or interacting with army and naval <strong>for</strong>ces. 25 Hence,<br />

the pendulum rather swung towards an air <strong>for</strong>ce designed to support the Army.<br />

On 26 February 1935, Hitler signed the decree on the foundation of the<br />

Reichsluftwaffe, putting it as the third branch of the Wehrmacht on an equal footing<br />

with Army and Navy and placing it under the command and control of Hermann<br />

Göring as commander-in-chief. 26 On 09 March 1935, Hitler had Göring proclaim<br />

officially that the German Reich was about to build up a German Air Force. In doing<br />

so, the Reich was to make its contribution to peacekeeping, acting within the scope<br />

of the Air Pact, which had been suggested by the Western powers. 27 A few days later,<br />

during a solemn ceremony; Hitler gave the first fighter wing of the new German Air<br />

Force the name of “Jagdgeschwader Richthofen”.<br />

Despite this clear violation of the Treaty of Versailles, the Western powers had<br />

shown practically no reaction, thus encouraging Hitler to declare on 16 March 1935<br />

that he was no longer willing to submit to the arms limitations set out by the Treaty<br />

of Versailles. At the same time, he proclaimed the reintroduction of compulsory mili-<br />

25 Cf. Deist, Die Aufrüstung der Wehrmacht (see Note 17), p. 484.<br />

26 Cf. Rudolf Absolon, Die Wehrmacht im Dritten Reich, Vol. 3, Boppard 1973, p. 177.<br />

27 Karl-Heinz Völker, Die deutsche Luftwaffe 1933-1939. Aufbau, Führung und Rüstung der Luftwaffe<br />

und die Entwicklung der deutschen Luftkriegstheorie (Beiträge zur Militär- und Kriegsgeschichte. Militärgeschichtliches<br />

Forschungsamt (ed.), Vol. 8). Stuttgart 1967, p. 68ff.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!