National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
National Experiences - British Commission for Military History
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
th e AIr Ar m d u r I n g t h e le b A n o n wA r 1982 171<br />
to bring it be<strong>for</strong>e the government <strong>for</strong> approval. It was agreed that the minister would<br />
present it to the government on Wednesday morning, while assessing that an approval<br />
will be obtained by 10:00, and an attack could be planned <strong>for</strong> 12:00.<br />
Chief of Staff Eitan decided to stay at the northern command <strong>for</strong> the night, and<br />
drive to Tel Aviv the following morning to join us at the IAF command post, from<br />
where we planned to conduct the fighting, and complete the preparations and briefings<br />
towards the attack.<br />
Minister Sharon wanted someone who is familiar with the plans to attend the government<br />
meeting with him, in order to answer any professional questions that may<br />
rise. It was decided that B/G Amos Amir, who left his position as head of air division,<br />
was now free of any role, would join the minister as an expert.<br />
The government meeting on Wednesday was lengthy. We kept in contact with<br />
Amos Amir and understood that a decision would not be made till 10:00, so I instructed<br />
the IAF to postpone the time starting the attack to 14:00 in order to operate<br />
without pressure. The government indeed gave its decision after 11:00, meaning that<br />
we had more than 2 hours <strong>for</strong> all the required actions.<br />
After receiving the approval, there was a sense of alert and tension in the command<br />
post. The command echelon felt as if it were just be<strong>for</strong>e a matriculation exam.<br />
The material was learned and exercised <strong>for</strong> years, but the test page is yet to be revealed.<br />
There was concern about unexpected questions.<br />
Personally, I began a series of phone calls with wing and base commanders, and<br />
C2I units, in order to make sure that everyone was aware of the approval and get<br />
feedback on their preparedness. I sensed that the IAF was alert and ready. This reminded<br />
me of the time be<strong>for</strong>e take off during “Moked” operation in the Six Day<br />
War. The crews know their goals, the “band’ knows how to play in synchronism after<br />
many drills. The instruments are tuned and waiting <strong>for</strong> the conductor to give the note.<br />
In this case, it was the hands of many clocks showing 14:00. The clocks were reset<br />
at all levels of control, command, and operation.<br />
The command cell, where we were prepared to control the special operation<br />
against the missile defense, was located in the new IAF command post, one floor<br />
under the main command center where I sat. All command cells face the control desk<br />
that gives a current air status picture. The desk and mission boards on top of it give<br />
one common language <strong>for</strong> all command cells.<br />
The command cell <strong>for</strong> the attack on the surface-to-air missiles exercised many<br />
times in simulation with and without airborne power. We had a skilled team headed<br />
by Sela and Itzik Ben Israel, whom I knew and could count on them while I, myself,<br />
had to focus on the interception of Syrian fighter planes that could be launched to<br />
protect to SAM batteries, but also threaten our <strong>for</strong>ces. This is where things can take<br />
an unexpected turn and require an immediate response. Experience in command is<br />
very significant here. In fact, I had to prevent Syrian air <strong>for</strong>ce from interfering with<br />
the attack on the surface-to-air missiles, so that the attack will take place without