06.01.2013 Views

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168 ai r p o w e r in 20 t H Ce n t u ry do C t r i n e s a n d em p l o y m e n t - nat i o n a l ex p e r i e n C e s<br />

to take part in containing the ground invasions from day one, so the operation plans<br />

did not come to a test.<br />

Despite the fact that the achievements at the end of the war were impressive, the<br />

IAF felt bad. This feeling was expressed by <strong>for</strong>mer IAF Commander Ezer Weizmann,<br />

later minister of defense and President of Israel: “The missile bent the wing of the<br />

fighter plane”.<br />

This resulted in a certain grinding in the strong status of the IAF, which had an<br />

impact on the distribution of budget and preference in allocation of manpower; i.e.,<br />

the ground <strong>for</strong>ces were considerably favored.<br />

In October 1977, I took the position of IAF Commander and replaced M/G Benny<br />

Peled – a charismatic commander who began a revolution, in the organizational<br />

structure and a more technological approach to answer operational problems.<br />

In November 1977, President Sadat arrived in Israel <strong>for</strong> a visit to Jerusalem, the<br />

beginning of a process of strategic importance that led to the signing of a peace treaty<br />

and retreat from Sinai in March 1979.<br />

Nevertheless, war against hostile activity continued in the north. In March 1978<br />

we find ourselves in the midst of the Litani operation, a military operation that tried<br />

to push back terrorist presence from the border deep into Lebanon, following the<br />

killing of civilians by terrorists who penetrated from Lebanon.<br />

After the Litani operation in March 1977, UNIFIL entered south Lebanon, but<br />

they did not prevent the terrorists from moving south and harassing the northern settlements.<br />

So we had to operate almost daily from the air against terrorist targets in<br />

south Lebanon. At the beginning interception aircraft were sent from Syria (MiG 21<br />

and MiG 23) in order to disturb our air activity; however, after a few encounters –<br />

many of them planned by us – they suffered accumulating losses in air combat, and<br />

usually remain to patrol in Syria without penetrating Lebanon. One could say that<br />

towards the Lebanon War of 1982 we achieved full freedom of air power in Lebanon,<br />

which was very significant to the IAF pilots’ esteem and air control.<br />

The Syrians, who understood that they are not a match to the IAF in air combat,<br />

transferred three SA-2, SA-3 and SA-6 surface to air missile divisions to the Lebanon<br />

Beka’a <strong>for</strong> protection against the IAF. This narrowed somewhat the air freedom of<br />

power on the Lebanese eastern side, thus reaching 1982.<br />

Attack on the surface-to-air missiles in the Beka’a in june 1982<br />

On Wednesday, 9 June 1982, at 14:00, the attack on the surface-to-air missiles<br />

during the Lebanon war began. This chapter deals with one of the greatest successes<br />

in air warfare, in which the dense surface-to-air missile defense was destructed –<br />

SA-2, SA-3, SA-6 missiles that were deployed in the Lebanon Beka’a valley and<br />

along Lebanon’s eastern border.<br />

The surface-to-air missile defense was a Soviet war doctrine, with a seperate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!