06.01.2013 Views

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

340 ai r p o w e r in 20 t H Ce n t u ry do C t r i n e s a n d em p l o y m e n t - nat i o n a l ex p e r i e n C e s<br />

carefully selected targets. It was an attractive doctrine that avoided the slaughter of<br />

enemy civilians and soldiers. If one deprived the enemy of his material to wage a<br />

war— then the enemy would be <strong>for</strong>ced to sue <strong>for</strong> peace.<br />

By the early 1930s such concepts were developed into a specific doctrine. At<br />

the Air Corps Tactical School in 1933 the faculty and students began research on<br />

identifying railroad chokepoints; vital railyards, and bridges whose loss would<br />

impose a massive dislocation of the national transportation net. 17 A generation of<br />

airmen was trained at the Air Corps Tactical School in the elements of airpower<br />

thinking that would dominate the U.S. Air Corps and, later, the Air Force. The ACTS<br />

doctrine of strategic bombardment known as the “industrial web theory” of airpower<br />

concentrated on identifying key nodes of economic activity whose loss would cripple<br />

whole sectors of the economy. 18<br />

The strategic bombing doctrine ensured decisive effect with an economy of<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t—but <strong>for</strong> such a doctrine to work America had to have an air weapon that had<br />

the range, speed, and accuracy to penetrate deep into enemy territory, avoid enemy<br />

air defenses, carry a heavy bomb load, and strike a pinpoint target. The rapidly<br />

developing American aviation technology turned the concept of strategic bombing<br />

from a fantasy into a real possibility in a few years. The mid-1920s to the mid-1930s<br />

saw an enormous advance in aircraft technology. In the 1930s aircraft engines went<br />

from 500 horsepower to 1,200 horsepower. NACA cowlings cut drag and increased<br />

speed. High octane fuel made engines more efficient while increasing range. The<br />

all metal and multi-engine transport planes built <strong>for</strong> the rapidly growing American<br />

airlines pioneered advanced production technologies and made the dramatic new<br />

engine and airframe designs the norm throughout the industry.<br />

In 1931 the Air Corps fielded its first all metal monoplane bomber. The two engine<br />

B-9 bomber had a retractable landing gear, a speed of 186 mph, carried 2260 pounds<br />

of bombs and was the most advanced bomber of its day. 19 The B-9 was followed in<br />

1932 by the B-10; another twin engine monoplane bomber equipped with machine<br />

gun turrets <strong>for</strong> defense and flew at 207 mph. 20 Even as the B-10 was being introduced<br />

into the Air Corps units, the Air Corps and Army leadership proposed an exponential<br />

leap in bomber technology. In 1934 the Air Corps negotiated with American’s<br />

aviation industry to develop a four-engine bomber that could carry 5,000 pounds<br />

of bombs <strong>for</strong> 1,300 miles, or 2,500 pounds of bombs <strong>for</strong> 2,300 miles. The next year<br />

the prototype of the B-17 first flew and on a test flight achieved an average speed of<br />

232 mph while flying a distance of 2,100 miles. 21 This exceeded all expectations and<br />

17<br />

A discussion of the role of Acts in development of American bombing concepts is found in Stephen<br />

McFarland, America’s Pursuit of Precision Bombing 1910-1945 (Washington: Smithsonian, 1995).<br />

18<br />

Ibid. pp. 176-177.<br />

19<br />

Budiansky, p. 181.<br />

20<br />

Ibid.<br />

21<br />

Ibid. pp. 181-183.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!