06.01.2013 Views

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

278 ai r p o w e r in 20 t H Ce n t u ry do C t r i n e s a n d em p l o y m e n t - nat i o n a l ex p e r i e n C e s<br />

consolidated this position with barbed wire, cleared fields of fire, created minefields,<br />

constructed shelters and concentrated artillery. General Ridgway, UN Commanderin-Chief<br />

(UNCINC), authorized local advances to gain more favourable ground <strong>for</strong><br />

defence and Van Fleet launched Operation Piledriver on 1 June 1951, which was<br />

to bring the US I and IX Corps to the Wyoming line by 15 June 1951. During this<br />

advance they encountered heavy enemy resistance organised in depth, as they approached<br />

the base of the ”Iron Triangle”. 28<br />

The Air Situation<br />

The air war during this period was characterized by two features: an intensified<br />

interdiction by the Far East Air Force (FEAF) into which SAAF, ROKAF and<br />

RAAF elements were incorporated, and the implementation of a revised air war plan<br />

by the Chinese Communist Air Force (CCAF) in mid-June. The FEAF interdiction<br />

campaign was named Operation Strangle and its objective was to isolate the MLR<br />

from its sources of supply in North Korea and Manchuria. A strip of territory stretching<br />

east-west across Korea, between 38° 15’N and 39° 15’N, was divided into three<br />

interdiction zones, a zone being allocated each to the 5th Air Force, the Navy and the<br />

1st Marine Air Wing. The enemy road and rail systems were placed under 24-hour<br />

attack (see Map 1). 29<br />

The revised air war plan of the CCAF was probably resulted from a conference<br />

between CCAF officers and their Soviet advisers held in Mukden in May 1951. The<br />

failure of the ground offensive was attributed to the CCAF’s failure to gain air superiority<br />

over Korea and in an attempt to rectify the situation it was decided that new<br />

‘International Communist Volunteer Air Force’ personnel would assist the CCAF;<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts to repair the North Korean airfields would be redoubled with the aid of cover<br />

provided by MIG-15’s; nuisance raids would be conducted against the South as soon<br />

as the North Korean airfields could take light aircraft; while Ilyushin ground attack<br />

aircraft (with crews trained by Russian advisers) would support the CCAF ground<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces in a new offensive. 30<br />

The Combat Role of 2 Squadron<br />

In common with other fighter-bomber squadrons of the 5 th Air Force, 2 Sqn SAAF<br />

was very involved in these events and both air and ground crews had to work very<br />

hard to maintain operations. Most of the FEAF fighter-bomber ef<strong>for</strong>t centred on<br />

interdiction missions, while the fighter-bombers were also utilised <strong>for</strong> close support,<br />

rescue and escort missions, or were diverted while en route to interdiction targets.<br />

28 Ibid., pp. 110-111.<br />

29 D. Rees, Korea: The Limited War, MacMillan, London, 1964, p. 376.<br />

30 R.F. Futrell, L.S. Mosley & A.F. Simpson, The United States Air Force in Korea, 1950-1953, Duell,<br />

Sloan and Pierce, New York, 1961, pp. 278-279.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!