06.01.2013 Views

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

National Experiences - British Commission for Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

348 ai r p o w e r in 20 t H Ce n t u ry do C t r i n e s a n d em p l o y m e n t - nat i o n a l ex p e r i e n C e s<br />

In 1965 and 1966 the Americans embarked on a major bombing campaign of<br />

North Vietnam that generally followed the Rostow/Bundy strategy. At the same time,<br />

large American ground combat <strong>for</strong>ces were sent to South Vietnam. The air campaign<br />

against North Vietnam that was expected to have quick and decisive effects failed<br />

to cripple the North Vietnamese military capabilities. 38 However, North Vietnamese<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces fighting in a low-level war in the south required relatively little in the way<br />

of logistics. Even a massive interdiction campaign by the U.S. could not stop the<br />

flow of supplies from North Vietnam to the south. By 1966 the “Rolling Thunder”<br />

bombing campaign had knocked out 60% of North Vietnam’s oil storage facilities.<br />

Yet the North Vietnamese quickly adapted their logistics system and dispersed fuel<br />

throughout the country in 55 gallon drums. Attacks that would have crippled a highly<br />

industrialized economy or mechanized armed <strong>for</strong>ces had little effect against a low<br />

tech country and military. 39<br />

The U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy carried on an intermittent strategic bombing<br />

campaign against North Vietnam and an interdiction campaign against the supply<br />

routes along the Ho Chi Minh trail from 1965 until 1973 when the U.S. <strong>for</strong>ces left South<br />

Vietnam. In many respects, the Vietnam war was an important learning experience<br />

<strong>for</strong> the American airpower. The US military employed many new technologies in<br />

the Vietnam War. Remote electronic sensors were deployed to collect targeting data<br />

along the Ho Chi Minh Trail. Many new aircraft were tested in combat. Laser-guided<br />

precision bombs saw their debut in bombing North Vietnam. The US Air Force also<br />

had to contend with highly sophisticated and extensive air defense systems in the<br />

skies over North Vietnam—and the aircraft losses throughout the whole of the war<br />

were heavy. Even though American airpower could claim significant tactical victories<br />

and accomplishments, as in Korea, the war <strong>for</strong> the Americans ended in a negotiated<br />

truce and not in anything resembling victory. This allowed <strong>for</strong> American withdrawal<br />

and final North Vietnamese victory over South Vietnam two years later. 40<br />

From the Cold War to Desert Storm<br />

After the very disappointing experience of Vietnam the U.S. military turned its<br />

attention to the more serious and immediate question of how to face the vast Soviet<br />

and Warsaw Pact conventional <strong>for</strong>ces in case of an open confrontation between East<br />

and West on a European battlefield. In the case of the Cold War turning hot, the United<br />

States could not count on numerical superiority, or even fighting with air superiority.<br />

38 A good overview of the U.S. bombing campaign against North Vietnam is found in Mark Clodfelter,<br />

The Limits of Air Power: The American Bombing of North Vietnam (New York: The Free Press,<br />

1989).<br />

39 Budiansky, pp. 382-383.<br />

40 See Kenneth Werrell, Chasing the Silver Bullet: U.S. Air Force Weapons Development from Vietnam<br />

to Desert Storm (Washington: Smithsonian Books, 2003) On US aircraft in Vietnam see pp. 9-35; on<br />

USAF munitions and sensors in Vietnam see pp. 36-54.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!