28.02.2018 Views

POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY TN

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annexure 1.2<br />

<strong>POVERTY</strong> LINE: CONCEPT AND MEASUREMENT<br />

a. Absolute and Relative Thresholds<br />

In most measurement exercises, there is a sharp dividing line below which a person is<br />

counted as poor. This divider is often called the “poverty line”. The general approach to<br />

specifying a poverty line is to estimate the cost of a bundle of goods deemed to assure<br />

that basic consumption needs are met. For developing countries, the most important<br />

component of a basic needs poverty line is the food expenditure necessary to attain a<br />

specified food energy intake, which may be augmented by an allowance for non-food<br />

needs.<br />

Setting food energy requirements, however, is quite problematic. There is little<br />

direct evidence on energy requirements. One widely used procedure (FAO/WHO/UNO<br />

1985) is to take energy requirements relative to alternative levels of activity and body<br />

weight. Activity levels may be endogenous socio-economic variables rather than<br />

exogenous physiological variables. A normative judgment needs to be made about<br />

desirable activity levels, so that corresponding energy requirements may be determined.<br />

Another problem relates to measuring the cost of the normative nutritional<br />

requirement, and in making provision for non-food consumption. A popular and often<br />

preferred method is to find the consumption expenditure at which a person is expected<br />

to attain the food energy requirement. This can be estimated from establishing a<br />

relationship between food intake and consumption expenditure. Depending on how the<br />

relevant norms are defined, the poverty line can be determined. Many a time, the<br />

poverty line is defined with reference to absolute norms that are exogenously specified.<br />

However, the relationship between food energy intake and consumption or<br />

income is not going to be the same across sub-groups or dates, and it shifts according to<br />

differences in income, tastes, activity levels, relative prices, levels of publicly provided<br />

goods, and other relevant factors.<br />

Some other methods aim to directly measure the cost of a normative food and<br />

non-food consumption bundle. The food bundle is related to the nutritional requirement,<br />

consistent with the tastes of the poor. Data on food prices are used for valuation. Setting<br />

the non-food component is more difficult. If non-food prices are not available, a<br />

reasonable choice [Ravallion (1993a), Ravallion and Bidani (1994)] for the non-food<br />

234

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!