10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2. Options for future climate change architectures 79<br />

Institutional<br />

feasibility<br />

0 + -<br />

The Multistage approach rates good in almost all criteria. It seems likely that<br />

any future regime will be staged in some form, it is a flexible system with many<br />

possibilities on types of stages and thresholds for moving stages. The critical<br />

element of the approach is that additional countries participate early enough so<br />

that stringent environmental goals are reached; there should be incentives for<br />

such participation, not only thresholds for participation. An important element<br />

is stage 2, pledge for sustainable development, which could be seen as a<br />

positive outcome for developing countries. The approach is, however, weak on<br />

the technical requirements as it can be a complicated system requiring many<br />

decisions.<br />

The Contraction and Convergence approach rates very well on the<br />

environmental and technical criteria due to its simplicity. But this simplicity is<br />

also its major disadvantage: it doesn’t take into account structural differences of<br />

countries and may not be accepted by most of the countries. Advanced<br />

developing countries, for example, would be treated the same way as low<br />

emission industrialized countries. The concept of eventually converging per<br />

capita emissions in the long term could be part of a futures regime; but classic<br />

Contraction and Convergence is too simple, and a decision that all countries<br />

participate at once could be seen as unrealistic.<br />

The Global Tryptich approach rated very well on the environmental criteria<br />

as it caps global emissions and on the economic criteria as it explicitly takes into<br />

account the national circumstances. It is a sophisticated approach to sharing<br />

emission allowances within any group of countries. Its major disadvantage is its<br />

relative complexity and the high data requirements, especially the assumed<br />

future production growth rates are critical. The Tryptich approach, although it<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!