10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2. Options for future climate change architectures 58<br />

Possible positions<br />

Table 2 - 2. Possible country positions. Contraction and Convergence (C&C)<br />

Least developed<br />

countries<br />

+ Benefit greatly through allocation of excess<br />

emission rights.<br />

India + Indian per capita emissions are below the<br />

world average, the per capita income and<br />

greenhouse gas emissions per unit of GDP are<br />

low compared to those of Annex I countries.<br />

The Prime Minister of India, as the host of<br />

COP 8, stressed that the only equitable form<br />

for the future would be one based on equal<br />

per capita rights (without further specifying<br />

whether this means C&C)<br />

China - China’s per-capita emissions are around the<br />

Advanced developing<br />

countries<br />

Non-Annex I average, growth in emissions<br />

would be capped early in the century.<br />

- Per capita emissions are above the Non-<br />

Annex I average; they would opt for more<br />

consideration of the historical responsibility<br />

(Brazilian Proposal).<br />

Group of 77 + G77 introduced a first mention of “narrowing<br />

per capita differences between developed and<br />

developing country Parties” in preambular<br />

part of the decision on the Kyoto<br />

mechanisms.<br />

Russia 0 Unknown; but relatively high per capita<br />

emissions.<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!