10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5. Conclusions 230<br />

use, buildings and industry will need to be cut very sharply. Developed countries<br />

need to cut their emissions by 80 to 90% by 2050, with interim emissions<br />

reduction of 20 to 40% by 2020.<br />

Some countries, lead by the EU, have clearly stated that a second<br />

commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol is the way forward. Building upon<br />

the existing elements and the institutional structure would avoid time-<br />

consuming future negotiations on a completely new institutional setup. Some<br />

other countries, mainly lead by the USA, see the Kyoto Protocol as having too<br />

many weaknesses to be a good basis for the future climate regime. Setting<br />

another mechanism is favored by these countries.<br />

The first group argues that the Kyoto framework should be modified only<br />

slightly to provide an incentive for developing country participation, while<br />

moving forward with even more ambitious emission caps for developed<br />

countries, including the United States; the Kyoto Protocol and its mechanisms<br />

reflect a tremendous investment and commitment by much of the international<br />

policy community. There is broad consensus that all three market mechanisms<br />

under the Kyoto Protocol should continue in the future. Setting binding country-<br />

level emission targets is critical to achieving long-term quantitative goals, such as<br />

stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations.<br />

Others challenge that the top-down approach is not viable in a world where<br />

no supranational authority exists to enforce such an agreement, and that<br />

incentives are driving a bottom-up international climate policy. This bottom-up<br />

approach may be broad in terms of participation, but very shallow in terms of actions.<br />

The world is already pursuing a hybrid bottom-up and top down approach. Parts of<br />

the world have pursued the top-down Kyoto approach, while others, such as<br />

the United States, have taken unilateral action on climate policy. A number of<br />

unilateral commitments with serious climate change impacts have been made,<br />

from the EU’s January 2008 package of energy and environmental policies to<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!