10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2. Options for future climate change architectures 102<br />

At COP8 in New Delhi 2002, Prime Minister Vajpayee said that the only<br />

equitable form for the future would be one based on equal per capita rights.<br />

Since India’s per capita emissions are only a third of the world average, a per-<br />

capita approach is preferred. Choosing an approach that clearly incorporates<br />

the element of per-capita emissions could open the door for possible acceptance<br />

by India.<br />

India relieves that an agreement based on sector-specific reviews of options<br />

and associated barriers would be more effective than a conventional top down<br />

approach. Its position is rather firm, but open to negotiations (see Kumar et al.,<br />

2008).<br />

3.2.2.2 China<br />

China is experiencing a remarkable growth in GDP (9% in 2003). China’s top<br />

priority is economic development. The severe environmental problems – e.g.<br />

the utilization rate of water resources is two times higher than the<br />

internationally accepted warning line – and unfavourable energy resource<br />

endowment – 2 nd biggest oil importer in the world, although having huge<br />

amounts of domestic coal-, are forcing China to take some measures. These<br />

include encouraging energy saving, the use of clean energy and the<br />

development of energy efficiency and renewable energy.<br />

The size, the strong dependence of coal and the fast growth of China will<br />

result in high emissions in the future. In order to achieve relatively low<br />

stabilization levels, it would be necessary to slow China’s emission growth<br />

already by 2020 .Under C&C and CDC, emissions have to be reduced below<br />

current non-Annex I average – China’s emissions per capita are slightly above<br />

the non-Annex I average -, China would therefore need to reduce emissions<br />

early under these approaches. However, under C&C, it would at the same time<br />

a positive impacts from the sale of emission allowances – the marginal emission<br />

abatement costs are very low compared to other countries. The multistage<br />

approach would leave China more room to grow in the short term. The<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!