10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4. Case Study: Spain 197<br />

Implementing the package would require a considerable economic effort and<br />

increased investment in renewable energy. Power plants, appliances and<br />

transport must be made more energy-efficient. The Commission has estimated<br />

the direct cost of achieving both the 20% GHG reduction target and the 20%<br />

renewable energy target simultaneously at 0.58% of EU GDP or €91billion in<br />

2020. Oil and gas imports are expected to go down by some € 50bn in 2020,<br />

while electricity prices are likely to go up by 10-15% in comparison to today’s<br />

level. Overall, this leads to an energy intensity improvement of approximately<br />

32% between 2005 and 2020. If emission reduction credits from projects in third<br />

countries such as CDM are allowed, costs are estimated to decrease to 0.45 % of<br />

GDP (see EC 2008).<br />

The proposal is to be discussed in parallel in the Council and the European<br />

Parliament; if approved, the package would become operational after the<br />

conclusion of the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, in 2013. If<br />

climate change is to be limited to 2ºC above the temperature in pre-industrial<br />

times, global emissions need to be halved by the middle of this century. The<br />

recently adopted Bali Roadmap in the latest Conference of the Parties was a<br />

breakthrough, with all countries – included the US and major developing<br />

countries – agreeing to start formal negotiations for a future international<br />

climate change agreement as a follow-up to the Kyoto Protocol, to be concluded<br />

by 2009.<br />

3.3 Model analysis (FAIR 2.1)<br />

This section analyses the emission reductions, abatement costs and reduction<br />

measures for Spain for the two options for post-2012 EU burden-sharing and<br />

ETS allocation presented in Section 3.2.<br />

The analysis focuses on three scenarios based on different assumptions for<br />

the level of international participation and the EU reduction objective:<br />

• EU 20% unilateral without CDM. Emission allowances are traded freely<br />

between the EU Member States, but this case assumes no availability of<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!