10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Implications of future climate regime architectures 137<br />

• Sectoral approach (Chapter 2, Section 2.2)<br />

All of the approaches include as an element emission reduction targets.<br />

Other approaches - such as an agreement on policies and measures (see Section<br />

2.3 of Chapter 2) or on technology development (see Section 2.4 of Chapter 2) -<br />

are not included, because their effect on countries’ emissions is difficult to<br />

quantify.<br />

Different sectoral approaches are discussed in international negotiations.<br />

One option would be that the industry in one global sector would assume a<br />

target (see Egenhofer, 2008); the responsibility to implement the target would<br />

be with that industry and not with the national governments. Another option is<br />

that responsibility stays with national governments but that the same rules for<br />

one sector are applied to all countries – e.g. emission standard or benchmark. A<br />

further option would be that emission targets are defined for all individual<br />

sectors as function of their respective output – e.g. ton of steel, kWh produced.<br />

The targets can still be reached in a flexible manner across greenhouse gases<br />

and sectors, as well as through emission trading. This last option is further<br />

developed into a global regime by the Center for Clean Air Policy (CCAP – see<br />

Section 4.5 of Chapter 2) (Schmidt et al., 2006) and is used in this analysis.<br />

The sectoral approach is modeled separately based on Höhne et al. (2006b)<br />

and not within the EVOC tool, used for the rest of approaches. Due to data<br />

limitations, the sectoral approach is only modeled until 2020, and not for all the<br />

regions – the result of the calculations cannot be shown completely in the<br />

figures below. The specific assumptions under which these approaches were<br />

explored, are not presented here (for more information see Höhne et al., 2007) –<br />

the focus is on the results.<br />

The approaches have already been assessed in Chapter 2, however, a brief<br />

qualitative comparison is going to de made in this Section. The strengths and<br />

weaknesses of the approaches selected are summarized in the following table:<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!