10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2. Options for future climate change architectures 57<br />

• Convergence: As a second step, the targets for individual countries<br />

are set. The global emission limit for each year is shared among all<br />

countries so that per capita emissions converge from the countries’<br />

current levels to a level equal for all countries within a convergence<br />

period.<br />

Global emission trading would be allowed to level off differences between<br />

allowances and actual emissions.<br />

Implications<br />

Current per capita emissions differ greatly between countries. Some<br />

developing countries could be allocated more emission allowances than<br />

necessary to cover their emissions (“hot air”). They could sell this allowances to<br />

developed countries, generating a flow of resources from developed to<br />

developing countries.<br />

Towards a stable CO2 concentration at 450ppmv and convergence by 2050,<br />

only smaller states in Africa and Asia would have unconstrained emissions and<br />

could sell excess allowances. The per capita emission have to converge to a level<br />

below the current average of developing countries, those developing countries<br />

above or close to the average (e.g. Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Mexico, South<br />

Africa, Korea, Namibia, Thailand, China) will soon (e.g. 2020) be constrained<br />

and not receive emission allowances. Due to the low per capita emission level<br />

required to reach the stringent global goal, the possible transfer of easily earned<br />

emission allowances could be relatively low. More excess allowances would be<br />

available under a higher stabilization level, e.g. 550 ppmv CO2, or under earlier<br />

convergence, e.g., 2030.<br />

Reaching a fixed global emission level is easier for Annex I countries if all<br />

Non- Annex I countries participate immediately (C&C), compared to a gradual<br />

phased approach. Only then relatively cost-effective mitigation options in some<br />

developing countries can be accessed and traded within the system.<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!