10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5. Conclusions 236<br />

and make side payments. For example, if the United States does not want to<br />

take on an ambitious emissions target, there will be much less demand and thus<br />

lower prices for the permits developing countries would aspire to export.<br />

Creating the incentive for some countries to participate should not<br />

simultaneously create the disincentive for others to do so. The challenge lies in<br />

whether governments of developed countries would be willing to finance<br />

substantial transfers to developing countries. The alternative would probably<br />

be a weak regime with little chance of preventing catastrophic climate change.<br />

One potential first step would be to recognize the steps that developing countries<br />

are already taking, such as China’s goal to reduce emissions intensity by 20<br />

percent. Another idea would be to look at domestic policies – such as<br />

eliminating energy subsidies – rather than caps on emissions. Particularly in<br />

developing countries there is a need to link climate policies to sustainable<br />

development, identifying and assessing Sustainable Development Policies and<br />

Measures (SD-PAMs) (Section 2.7, Chapter 2) already in place, and a careful<br />

monitoring of their evolution and potential inter-play with climate policies. SD<br />

PAMs could incorporate climate change efforts into development priorities.<br />

In the interim period when developing countries do not yet have binding<br />

emission targets, they could use baseline-and-credit schemes such as the Clean<br />

Development Mechanism (CDM). Countries would not be penalized for<br />

remaining above the emissions threshold, but could earn credits by moving<br />

below baseline emissions. However, the current CDM structure is not able to<br />

generate the financial and technological flows needed.<br />

The CDM needs to move from a project-based approach to a programmatic<br />

approach – perhaps based on sector-specific efficiency targets or on<br />

technology benchmarks –, which would facilitate scaling-up. Sectors where<br />

this approach might work include most emissions- and energy-intensive<br />

industries – these include electric power, refining, pulp and paper, metals and<br />

cement. Sector benchmarks may also be a good way of incorporating<br />

international transport emissions (airlines, shipping) into the future climate<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!