10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2. Options for future climate change architectures 103<br />

Tryptich approach requires relatively strict emission limits for the electricity<br />

sector – China is strongly dependant to coal, its emissions per kWh electricity<br />

are among the highest in the world – therefore relatively stringent reductions<br />

for China. (Höhne e al., 2007b).<br />

China takes a proactive attitude towards the global efforts for climate change<br />

control. However, it reiterates that as a developing country, it should focus on<br />

economic development and poverty alleviation and not have binding emission<br />

reduction commitments. Developed countries, who are responsible for all the<br />

emissions to date and still have much higher per capita emissions, should take<br />

the lead. Developing countries should be able to increase their emission to meet<br />

their development needs.<br />

China may only be convinced to take further action if the agreement is seen<br />

not to cap its economic growth or being economically beneficial for China.<br />

Some possible options are: increased participation in the CDM (could generate<br />

revenues), no-lose targets (allowances could be sold if targets are overachieved,<br />

but none would have to be bought if targets are not reached), or rate based<br />

targets (e.g. as a function of kWh or tonne of steel produced, which could take<br />

away the fear of capping economic growth).<br />

3.2.2.3 USA<br />

As the largest emitter with very high emissions per capita and very high<br />

GDP per capita, USA would need to reduce its emissions substantially under all<br />

approaches. Convergence of emissions per capita (C&C and CDC) would be<br />

demanding because of the current high levels – among the highest in the world.<br />

The Tryptich approach would also be demanding because of these and the<br />

relatively low efficiency compared to other Annex I countries; the electricity<br />

sector is also very significant for the USA. As for most Annex I countries, the<br />

Multistage approach would lead to the most stringent reduction efforts to<br />

compensate that most developing countries participate late in time (Höhne et<br />

al., 2007b).<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!