10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2. Options for future climate change architectures 70<br />

Participation<br />

Sharing emission<br />

allowances<br />

Four groups or<br />

stages.<br />

Based on proposals<br />

by countries and<br />

negotiations.<br />

Within each stage,<br />

targets are equal.<br />

All countries. All countries.<br />

Converging per<br />

capita emissions.<br />

Tryptich<br />

methodology.<br />

Sector-based<br />

approach.<br />

Originally only<br />

industrialized<br />

countries, could be<br />

potentially applied<br />

to all countries.<br />

Formula based on<br />

historical<br />

contribution to<br />

global temperature<br />

increase.<br />

With the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, the Brazilian Proposal was<br />

overtaken. Although historical responsibility may play a role in the design of a<br />

future agreement - used as an indicator to determine when a country should act<br />

or to determine the share of financial contribution to adaptation activities - it is<br />

unlikely that it will be the only parameter used for burden sharing. It will<br />

therefore not be included in the following assessment of approaches (Section<br />

2.1.4), as it covers only part of a regime, and wouldn’t be applied on its own.<br />

The consideration of its methodological and scientific aspects has been subject<br />

to continued debate within the international negotiation process; a joint<br />

scientific effort is currently being organized by the Ad hoc group on the<br />

modeling and assessment of contributions to climate change.<br />

2.1.4 Qualitative Comparison<br />

In the following section, the approaches described above are going to be<br />

assessed based on the criteria already introduced in Section 1.2:<br />

• Environmental effectiveness (environmental criteria)<br />

• Cost-effectiveness (economic criteria)<br />

• Distributional considerations (political criteria)<br />

• Institutional feasibility (technical criteria)<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!