10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4. Case Study: Spain 191<br />

negotiations. The recently proposed EU effort sharing is based on a cost-<br />

effective reduction approach (similar to case (i)).<br />

Subsequently, the EU-wide cap for the ETS as a whole is allocated straight to<br />

the eligible installations throughout the system, based on EU-wide allocation<br />

rules. In contrast, the EU-wide target for the non-ETS sector is first shared<br />

among the Member States, which can be based on a variety of burden-sharing<br />

approaches; here, the approaches selected are Marginal abatement costs,<br />

Grandfathering, Triptych and Per capita convergence. The Commission proposes<br />

using GDP/capita as the main criteria when setting the targets for Member<br />

States.<br />

Sijm et al. (2007) discussed the pros and cons of both options. Centralizing or<br />

harmonizing the process of setting the ETS cap and the allocation rules for<br />

eligible installations throughout the EU, as in option 2, may appear an attractive<br />

option as it reduces competitive distortions and other adverse effects due to a<br />

national-oriented allocation process, but it implies a significant transfer of<br />

decision competence from the national to the EU level (compared to the present<br />

allocation process).<br />

3.2.1 European Commission’s proposal for EU effort sharing (January 2008)<br />

On 23 rd January 2008 the European Commission included a proposal on how<br />

efforts could be shared among Member States (MS) to achieve the targets<br />

endorsed both by the European Parliament 1 and by EU leaders at the March<br />

2007 European Council (see Section 3.1).<br />

The EU ETS is an EU-wide policy instrument used to reduce GHG emissions<br />

in electricity plants and major industrial installations in a cost-effective manner,<br />

currently covering some 40% of all EU-27 GHG emissions. In the past, National<br />

Allocation Plans (NAPs) were used to define the total amounts of allowances to<br />

be distributed to these companies.<br />

1 European Parliament resolution on climate change adopted on 14 February 2007 (P6_TA(2007)0038).<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!