10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Implications of future climate regime architectures 142<br />

providing information on the magnitude of effort required from the different<br />

Parties.<br />

- Annex I regions<br />

Having a first look at Annex I regions’ reference scenarios – which represent<br />

their change in emissions from 1990 taking into account only the policies<br />

already implemented (business-as-usual scenario) – emissions would increase<br />

in all of them, specially in the rest of Annex I (RAI) region and in the USA. In<br />

2020, Germany would have been the only one to have reduced their emissions,<br />

together with Russia (although Russia’s decreasing emissions have nothing to<br />

do with a gain in efficiency or clean energy). In 2050, emissions would be lower<br />

in general; Japan (whose efficiency is already very high) and the UK, would join<br />

Germany and Russia in the decreasing emissions group. All regions would<br />

have decreased their emissions, except for Russia and the rest of Annex I<br />

countries from Eastern Europe (RUS+EEU), which even though still lower than<br />

1990 levels, emissions from 2020 to 2050 would increase. The reference scenario<br />

is important to determine the reduction efforts of each region.<br />

At a first quick glance, it can be observed that regional emission allowances<br />

for the different approaches and also between regions are far more<br />

homogeneous in 2050 (all regions would have had to reduce emissions around<br />

90% of 1990 levels) than in 2020. This may be because all the approaches<br />

selected for the study show some convergence in the per capita emissions<br />

around 2050.<br />

The Multistage approach (the global intensity target approach is not studied<br />

here) is the most demanding for all the regions and both in 2020 and 2050;<br />

followed by the CDC approach. These are both staged approaches in which<br />

developing countries would not participate until they reach a certain threshold,<br />

therefore developed countries would have to support part of their burden in<br />

order to reach low stabilization levels. For 2020, the sectoral approach would be<br />

even more demanding for Annex I countries as a group; nevertheless, this<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!