10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2. Options for future climate change architectures 105<br />

In the United States, alternative kinds of approaches (element 1) were<br />

mainly proposed. Actions were proposed instead of quantitative emission<br />

targets that would be less acceptable to the national government, commitments<br />

on policies and measures were preferable. They intended to give more impetus<br />

to technology innovation and diffusion. Long-term goals (element 2) were<br />

discussed, mainly from the perspectives of technological development, cost<br />

implications and action under uncertainty. Many proposals were intended to<br />

offer alternatives to the Kyoto Protocol (element 3); these were expected to be<br />

more realistic but not to ensure environmental effectiveness.<br />

In the non-Annex I country group, may articles showed concern for equity.<br />

The Brazilian Proposal emphasized responsibility for historical cumulative<br />

emissions, India and China emphasized per capita concerns as measures for<br />

allocating emission reduction targets (element 1). A contentious issue was<br />

developing countries’ participation in emissions mitigation schemes (element<br />

2). The Kyoto Protocol is generally recognized as a first step in climate policy<br />

and seemed to assume that it would continue (element 3). Sustainable<br />

development is also a crucial issue in developing countries.<br />

Large differences in tendency between regions can be observed. There are<br />

several reasons. The main reason is that primary concerns and interests in each<br />

region are different (see Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 for further discussion on<br />

countries’ interests). Another reason could be related to how the “international<br />

relation” is observed: e.g. proposals from the EU may assume that international<br />

laws are well respected, and that global issues should be dealt at multilateral<br />

level; US proposals may see the world under anarchy where countries seek for<br />

self-interest. Proposals for a future climate regime reflect not only consequences<br />

related to climate policy but also views concerning current international<br />

relations in general.<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!