Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 3. Implications of future climate regime architectures 140<br />
2.2 Results and discussion<br />
Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 show modeled results for the change in<br />
emission allowances from 1990 to 2020 and 1990 to 2050 for the 450, 550 and 650<br />
ppmv CO2eq. cases respectively for Contraction and Convergence (C&C),<br />
Common but Differentiated Convergence (CDC), Multistage, Triptych, the<br />
Sectoral approach, Global intensity targets (which will not be discussed here)<br />
and the reference case. Here, the initial emission allocation before trading is<br />
shown, final resulting emission levels after trading are different (these will be<br />
discussed in Section 4, as a necessary analysis for the calculation of regional<br />
abatement cost).<br />
To capture a wide spread of possible future developments, one case is<br />
calculated for each of the IPCC scenarios (Nakicenovic et al., 2000). In the<br />
figures, the median over these different scenarios is provided; the whole spread<br />
of scenarios is provided as error bars. Comparing the reductions with the<br />
reference cases gives an indication about the level of effort needed to reach the<br />
reductions.<br />
The horizontal red lines for Annex I countries indicate the emission level in<br />
2010 – the starting point for the calculations. For most countries this is the<br />
Kyoto target (solid lines). For the USA the 2010 level is based on the national<br />
target of an improvement of emissions per GDP by 18% from 2002 to 2012. This<br />
would result in emissions far above the Kyoto target (+23%, dotted line,<br />
compared to -7%). For Russia and the rest of Eastern Europe in Annex I the<br />
reference emissions in 2010 are chosen as a starting point, which are well below<br />
their Kyoto target (-32%, dotted line, compared to -8%).<br />
For a typical Annex I country – some exceptions are Spain or Portugal -<br />
emissions have declined from their 1990 value to their Kyoto target in 2010 (see<br />
Figure 4 left), from then on further reductions are necessary. Typical Non-<br />
Annex I countries’ emissions increase from 1990 until they participate (earliest<br />
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008