10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2. Options for future climate change architectures 119<br />

The South North Proposal preserves developmental equity under a stringent<br />

mitigation target; it also specifies that mitigation costs in poor countries must be<br />

paid by wealthy countries. Graduation thresholds could be lowered so the<br />

environmental goals be more stringent, but the right to development over time<br />

would be weakened. This tension – between the demands of our threatened<br />

climate and the development of the South – is a critical issue in global climate<br />

change negotiations.<br />

4.3 Greenhouse Development Rights<br />

The Greenhouse Development Rights approach, developed by EcoEquity, is<br />

a proposal for a comprehensive climate regime in which national obligations to<br />

pay for mitigation and adaptation are explicitly tied to a quantitative indicator<br />

of responsibility and capacity. The mitigation side could, but need not be<br />

implemented as a global cap-and-trade regime.<br />

Its central principle is the right to development, rather than a right to<br />

emissions. A ‘development threshold’ is defined – set at 150% of a global<br />

poverty line, approximated by $16 a day, an indicative development threshold<br />

would be $9000 a year (PPP). The GDR burden-sharing framework is based on<br />

the same two principles that underlie the UNFCCC: capacity and responsibility.<br />

Individuals below this level within a country are not expected to share the<br />

burden of mitigating the climate problem.<br />

Based on the national per capita income and Gini coefficient (a measure of<br />

national income inequality), the income that the wealthier portion of population<br />

has in excess of the development threshold is calculated – representing this each<br />

country’s capacity (see Figure 2 – 1). Less than 1% of India’s population earns<br />

more than $9000, approximately 10% of China’s population, and roughly 90%<br />

of the US population.<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!