10.05.2013 Views

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Carmen Bunzl - Universidad Pontificia Comillas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3. Implications of future climate regime architectures 148<br />

- Annex I regions<br />

Substantial reductions are still needed in order to achieve a concentration<br />

level of 550 ppmv CO2eq. 1 , Annex I countries need to reduce emissions below<br />

1990 levels in the order of 15% to 30% in 2020 and 55% to 90% in 2050.<br />

The impact of different approaches in a certain region wouldn’t change much<br />

compared to the 450 ppmv CO2eq. scenario. The Multistage approach would be<br />

the most demanding, followed by the CDC, C&C and the least demanding<br />

would be the Triptych approach. Even though it is still not very large,<br />

differences between approaches are more significant for a higher stabilization<br />

level. This may be due to later participation of developing countries, under<br />

staged approaches such as the Multistage and CDC.<br />

One exception is USA in 2020, the Multistage approach would still be the most<br />

demanding, but the CDC approach would even allow for an increase of<br />

emissions compared to 1990 levels. A choice of a higher stabilization level,<br />

regarding these results, would be much more beneficial for USA than for other<br />

regions in 2020 – EU, for example, would have to reduce a 10% less; the USA<br />

would have to reduce 20% less. This may be because of USA’s high emissions<br />

per capita, under a higher stabilization level, these would not have to converge<br />

such a low level; this beneficiates countries with high emissions per capita.<br />

- Non-Annex I regions<br />

On the other hand, a higher stabilization scenario requires less efforts from<br />

developing countries. In 2020, none of them have to reduce their emissions<br />

compared to 1990 levels. South Asia would even have more emission<br />

allowances than their baseline scenario under C&C, so called “hot air”. Under<br />

staged approaches such as CDC and Multistage, South Asia would not start to<br />

participate until after 2020.<br />

1 Using various probability distributions of the climate sensitivity, Hare and Meinshausen (2004;<br />

Meinshausen 2005) conclude that it is “unlikely” that the 2°C will be met (70%-100% risk of stabilizing<br />

above) with stabilisation at 550 ppmv CO2eq.<br />

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI <strong>Carmen</strong> <strong>Bunzl</strong> Boulet Junio 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!