16.11.2012 Views

Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI

Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI

Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARV value of the fitted curve at the time of the first <strong>and</strong> the last stroke<br />

were computed. For the frequency analysis mean frequency (MNF) was<br />

calculated. The values of MNF were plotted as a function of time. L<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

regression analysis was applied to obta<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial value (the value of<br />

MNF at the time of the first stroke) <strong>and</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al value (the value of<br />

MNF at the time of the last stroke), labelled MNF Sbeg <strong>and</strong> MNF Send respectively.<br />

In order to normalize results between subjects the f<strong>in</strong>al values<br />

were expressed as a percentage of the <strong>in</strong>itial values <strong>and</strong> labelled MNF n.<br />

Descriptive statistics <strong>and</strong> repeated measures ANOVA, with subsequent<br />

Tukey’s test for post-hoc analysis were used for multiple comparisons<br />

between the groups.<br />

results<br />

The average blood lactate values collected before <strong>and</strong> 1, 3 <strong>and</strong> 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

after the swim were 1.8 ± 0.6, 6.7 ± 1.47, 12.7 ± 2.2 <strong>and</strong> 14.1 ±<br />

2.93 mmol.l -1 respectively. The highest lactate value collected was 17.7<br />

mmol.l -1 .<br />

Stroke rate (SR), stroke length (SL) <strong>and</strong> SS (S) are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1<br />

Table 1. Stroke length (SL), stroke rate (SR) <strong>and</strong> swimm<strong>in</strong>g speed SS<br />

(S)<br />

SL(m) SR(stroke*m<strong>in</strong>-1 ) S(m/s)<br />

Distance (m) av. SD av. SD av. SD<br />

25 2.00 0.13 50.56 4.15 1.68 0.08<br />

50 2.02 0.16 47.12 5.33 1.58 0.09<br />

75 1.94 0.14 46.32 4.54 1.49 0.06<br />

100 1.89 0.18 45.77 4.71 1.43 0.08<br />

The ARV calculated for LD2 <strong>and</strong> TB <strong>in</strong>creased significantly at the end<br />

of the swimm<strong>in</strong>g with respect to the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of swimm<strong>in</strong>g as shown<br />

<strong>in</strong> Figure 2, left.<br />

Fig.2. Left: Comparison of the amplitude (ARV) of the EMG signal at<br />

the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> the end of 100 m all-out swim. Right: Mean MNF<br />

values with SD of MNF Sbeg <strong>and</strong> MNF Send for all muscles *p < 0.05.<br />

The differences between the MNF Sbeg <strong>and</strong> the MNF Send , were significant<br />

for all muscles (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!