16.11.2012 Views

Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI

Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI

Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Biomechanics</strong><strong>and</strong>medic<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>swimm<strong>in</strong>gXi<br />

Critical Velocity <strong>and</strong> the Velocity at Maximal Lactate<br />

Steady State <strong>in</strong> Swimm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

espada, M.A., Alves, F.B.<br />

Faculty of Human K<strong>in</strong>etics - Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal<br />

The purpose of this study was to compare critical velocity (CV) to the<br />

velocity at maximal lactate steady state (MLSSv) <strong>in</strong> swimm<strong>in</strong>g. Eighteen<br />

well-tra<strong>in</strong>ed male swimmers performed a maximal 400 m front<br />

crawl to estimate maximal aerobic velocity (V400) <strong>and</strong> two to three 30m<strong>in</strong><br />

constant velocity swims <strong>in</strong> order to directly determ<strong>in</strong>e MLSSv. CV,<br />

estimated from 200 m <strong>and</strong> 400 m maximal swims, was highly correlated<br />

to MLSSv (r = 0.94 <strong>and</strong> p < 0.01) <strong>and</strong> V400 (r = 0.95 <strong>and</strong> p < 0.01).<br />

However, CV was significantly faster than MLSSv, confirm<strong>in</strong>g that this<br />

parameter does not represent a steady metabolic rate <strong>in</strong> long distance<br />

swimm<strong>in</strong>g. Nevertheless, CV still seems to be a useful tool for aerobic<br />

condition<strong>in</strong>g evaluation, due to the simplicity of its determ<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

Keywords: exercise; swimm<strong>in</strong>g; Maximal lactate steady state; critical<br />

Velocity<br />

IntroductIon<br />

The maximal tolerated duration of a constant-load high-<strong>in</strong>tensity swimm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bout has been shown to be a hyperbolic function of the power (or<br />

velocity) of the exercise (Wakayoshi et al., 1992), similarly to other forms<br />

of human locomotion (for a review, see Morton, 2006). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to this<br />

model, the velocity-duration relationship has an asymptote on the velocity<br />

axis, termed the critical velocity (CV) that has been considered as a valid<br />

fatigue threshold <strong>and</strong> a marker of the transition between the heavy <strong>and</strong><br />

the severe <strong>in</strong>tensity doma<strong>in</strong>s (Poole et al., 1988), s<strong>in</strong>ce it has also been<br />

shown to be a close correlate of the highest metabolic rate associated with<br />

pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO2), acid-base status <strong>and</strong> blood lactate concentration<br />

that can be susta<strong>in</strong>ed for a certa<strong>in</strong> time at a constant level.<br />

The power output or the velocity correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the CV has also<br />

been considered as express<strong>in</strong>g the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS)<br />

(discussed <strong>in</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>and</strong> Jones, 2002), although this equivalence has not<br />

been confirmed <strong>in</strong> many experimental studies, especially <strong>in</strong> swimm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Dekerle et al., 2005b).<br />

The MLSS corresponds to the highest workload or velocity that<br />

can be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed over time without a cont<strong>in</strong>uous blood lactate accumulation<br />

(Billat et al., 2003) <strong>and</strong> its measurement dem<strong>and</strong>s several<br />

subsequent constant load tests that have to be performed with different<br />

workloads on different days, until it is possible the determ<strong>in</strong>e an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual workload <strong>in</strong>tensity above which the rate of lactate production<br />

exceeds lactate clearance. However, the number of studies directly<br />

assess<strong>in</strong>g this parameter is surpris<strong>in</strong>g limited <strong>in</strong> swimm<strong>in</strong>g, due surely<br />

to the time-consum<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> cumbersome procedures required, when<br />

compared to the performance of an <strong>in</strong>cremental graded test for lactate<br />

threshold determ<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

The purpose of this study was to compare critical velocity (CV), estimated<br />

by a two-component model, us<strong>in</strong>g 200 m <strong>and</strong> 400 m maximal<br />

swims, to the velocity at maximal lactate steady state (MLSSv) <strong>in</strong> welltra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

swimmers.<br />

Methods<br />

Eighteen male national <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational level competitive swimmers<br />

volunteered for this study. They were aged 17.1 ± 2.8 years, with a height<br />

of 177.6 ± 5.7 cm, a body mass of 65.8 ± 9.1 kg <strong>and</strong> a% body fat of 10.1<br />

± 2.4%. Subjects have tra<strong>in</strong>ed regularly for at least 6 years <strong>and</strong> took no<br />

drugs or medicaments dur<strong>in</strong>g the study. Most of the swimmers were<br />

familiar with swimm<strong>in</strong>g pool exercise test<strong>in</strong>g procedures. They were <strong>in</strong>formed<br />

of the nature of the experiments <strong>and</strong> gave written consent to<br />

participate <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />

194<br />

Athletes were <strong>in</strong>structed to avoid exhaust<strong>in</strong>g exercise the day before<br />

the tests <strong>and</strong> to reta<strong>in</strong> their normal nutritional habits. A st<strong>and</strong>ardize<br />

warm-up of 600 m was completed <strong>in</strong> every test<strong>in</strong>g session. A maximal<br />

400 m front crawl was performed <strong>in</strong> order to use the average velocity<br />

between 50 m <strong>and</strong> the 350 m (V400) as an estimate of the maximal<br />

aerobic velocity (Lavoie <strong>and</strong> Leone, 1988).<br />

CV was calculated from the slope of the regression analysis between<br />

the averaged velocity of the 400 m trial previously referred to <strong>and</strong> a 200<br />

m front crawl maximal trial performed for this purpose.<br />

In a first round of test<strong>in</strong>g, six subjects performed 30-m<strong>in</strong> constant<br />

velocity swims at 75 <strong>and</strong> 80% of V400. The physiological impact of these<br />

bouts was clearly low so it was decided to cont<strong>in</strong>ue the study us<strong>in</strong>g higher<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensities. All eighteen subjects performed, then, <strong>in</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om order,<br />

30-m<strong>in</strong> at constant velocity at 85, 90 <strong>and</strong> 95% of V400. Split times for<br />

each 50 m were determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> used by two <strong>in</strong>vestigators positioned at<br />

7.5 m <strong>and</strong> 17.5 m of the pool to control the athletes swimm<strong>in</strong>g pace. The<br />

swimmer was asked to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the pre-established swim pace as long<br />

as possible. The test was <strong>in</strong>terrupted when the swimmer could no longer<br />

match the required swimm<strong>in</strong>g velocity. Each subject was stopped every<br />

400 m (30 to 45 seconds) for blood sample collection <strong>and</strong> record of the<br />

rate of perceived exertion (MLSSrpe) (6-20 scale).<br />

Maximal lactate steady state blood lactate concentration (MLSSc)<br />

was def<strong>in</strong>ed as the highest blood lactate concentration that <strong>in</strong>creased by<br />

no more than 1 mmol.L-1 dur<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>al 20-m<strong>in</strong> of a 30-m<strong>in</strong> constant<br />

workload (Beneke, 2003; Baron et al., 2005). When this criterion was<br />

not accomplished, the test was stopped. MLSSv was the <strong>in</strong>tensity associated<br />

with MLSS. Tests were conducted at similar times on separate<br />

days (1 day of total rest between tests) at a 25 m pool with the water<br />

temperature at 28.2º C. No polyurethane suits were used.<br />

Stroke rate (SR) was measured from three stroke cycles taken <strong>in</strong> the<br />

middle of the pool for every 50 m <strong>and</strong> stroke length (SL) calculated.<br />

Blood lactate concentrations were analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g a Lactate Pro LT device<br />

(Arkray, Kyoto, Japan). A Polar Sport Tester (S410) recorded the<br />

heart rate frequency every 5 seconds dur<strong>in</strong>g all tests.<br />

Paired-samples t-test was used to compare CV <strong>and</strong> MLSSv. Pearson’s<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ear coefficient was used to test correlations. Statistical significance<br />

was accepted at p < 0.05.<br />

results<br />

Mean <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of V400, MLSSv, CV <strong>and</strong> MLSSc are<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1. MLSSv corresponded to 89.7 ± 1.2% <strong>and</strong> CV to 94.0<br />

± 1.5% of V400. Only one swimmer achieved MLSS at 85% of V400. At<br />

95% of V400 no one achieved stabilization <strong>in</strong> blood lactate concentration,<br />

confirm<strong>in</strong>g that work bouts at this <strong>in</strong>tensity were performed above<br />

MLSS. Extreme values of 2.6 <strong>and</strong> 7.8 mmol.L -1 were found associated<br />

to MLSSv. Mean SR at MLSSv was 32.9 ± 4.3 (cycles.m<strong>in</strong> -1 ) <strong>and</strong> mean<br />

SL was 2.49 ± 0.34 (m.cycle -1 ). Mean heart rate frequency at MLSSv<br />

(MLSS HR ) was 177.0 ± 6.9 beats.m<strong>in</strong> -1 <strong>and</strong> the mean MLSSrpe expressed<br />

by the swimmers was 13.39 ± 1.33.<br />

Table 1. Mean <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of V400, MLSSv, CV <strong>and</strong><br />

MLSSc.<br />

N=18<br />

V400<br />

(m·s-1)<br />

MLSSv<br />

(m·s-1)<br />

CV<br />

(m·s-1)<br />

MLSSc<br />

(mmol·L-1)<br />

1.49 ± 0.07 1.34 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.08 5.3 ± 1.6<br />

CV was significantly faster than MLSSv (p < 0.01) <strong>and</strong> both expressed<br />

velocities significantly different from V400 (p < 0.01).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!