16.11.2012 Views

Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI

Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI

Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Biomechanics</strong><strong>and</strong>medic<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>swimm<strong>in</strong>gXi<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to our results, the rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval between swims, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

4x50m ‘’broken’’ swim, should be great enough to partly replenish energy<br />

sources. Additionally, <strong>in</strong> ‘’broken’’ swimm<strong>in</strong>g the high speed ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

capacity is improved when the swimm<strong>in</strong>g speed between swims<br />

is high <strong>and</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s constant throughout sets with similar physiological<br />

responses as those <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous swimm<strong>in</strong>g. However, the rest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval needed for improv<strong>in</strong>g the high speed ma<strong>in</strong>tenance capacity<br />

may depend on athlete’s fitness level. In this study, the 20 s rest<strong>in</strong>g time<br />

between swims was adequate while the shorter rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervals were<br />

not enough to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>and</strong> the swimm<strong>in</strong>g speed <strong>in</strong> levels<br />

higher than that of cont<strong>in</strong>uous swimm<strong>in</strong>g. Consequently, if the <strong>in</strong>terval<br />

time between swims is very short, the concrete tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g target of ‘’broken’’<br />

swim can not be accomplished. However, shorter rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervals<br />

could be used to overload the swimmers with relatively higher <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />

than straight 200m.<br />

The results verified the hypotheses while <strong>in</strong> some circumstances<br />

were differentiated depend<strong>in</strong>g on the rest <strong>in</strong>terval. Regardless of the rest<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval between swims <strong>in</strong> ‘’broken’’ swimm<strong>in</strong>g, the maximum lactate<br />

concentration <strong>and</strong> O 2 deficit were similar at the end of each condition.<br />

The heart rate <strong>in</strong> the condition of 20 s rest <strong>in</strong>terval was higher than <strong>in</strong><br />

conditions of shorter rest <strong>in</strong>terval due to the greater exercise <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />

On the contrary, no differences were observed for heart rate, when the<br />

rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval was short (10 <strong>and</strong> 5 s.). Based on our results, performance<br />

improvement <strong>in</strong> ‘’broken’’ swimm<strong>in</strong>g needed the concrete <strong>in</strong>terval<br />

time of 20 s.<br />

The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple limitation of the present study is the sample size.<br />

12 male, young swimmers (14-17 years) participated. The conclusions<br />

drawn by the present study can not be generalized for elite swimmers,<br />

women <strong>and</strong> for different swimm<strong>in</strong>g style <strong>and</strong> distance, given the fact<br />

that 200m distance <strong>and</strong> free style swimm<strong>in</strong>g were employed.<br />

conclusIons<br />

The present study has <strong>in</strong>vestigated the physiological responses of ‘’broken’’<br />

swimm<strong>in</strong>g (4x50m) with different rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval compared with<br />

those of cont<strong>in</strong>uous method (200m) dur<strong>in</strong>g free-style swimm<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

maximum <strong>in</strong>tensity. Moreover, the present study exam<strong>in</strong>ed which specific<br />

rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>in</strong> ‘’broken’’ swimm<strong>in</strong>g, contributes to the development<br />

of higher swimm<strong>in</strong>g speed with similar physiological dem<strong>and</strong>s<br />

compared to those of cont<strong>in</strong>uous swimm<strong>in</strong>g. Our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs suggest that<br />

the physiological responses of the two methods are similar <strong>and</strong> ‘’broken’’<br />

swimm<strong>in</strong>g with short rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval does not give any benefit for<br />

swimm<strong>in</strong>g speed improvement. Different benefits could be ga<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

shorter rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervals. However, it was found that swimmers <strong>in</strong> ‘’broken’’<br />

swimm<strong>in</strong>g derived a significant benefit from swimm<strong>in</strong>g with 20<br />

s rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval between swims. Particularly, it seems that swimm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

performance <strong>in</strong> ‘’broken’’ swimm<strong>in</strong>g needs 20 s rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terval between<br />

swims to be developed.<br />

reFerences<br />

Billat, V. & Koralszte<strong>in</strong>, J.P. (1996). Significance of the velocity at VO-<br />

2max <strong>and</strong> time to exhaustion at this velocity. Sports Med. 22 (2), 90-<br />

108.<br />

Borg, A.G. (1982). Pshychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci<br />

Sports Exerc. 14 (5), 377-381.<br />

Chen, M.J., Fan X. & Moe S. T. (2002). Criterion-related validity of<br />

the Borg rat<strong>in</strong>gs of perceived exertion scale <strong>in</strong> healthy <strong>in</strong>dividuals: a<br />

meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 20, 873-899.<br />

Di Prampero, P.E., Davies, C.T.M., Cerretelli, P. & Margaria, R. (1970).<br />

An analysis of O2 debt contracted <strong>in</strong> submaximal exercise. J Appl<br />

Physiol. 29 (5), 547-551.<br />

Fern<strong>and</strong>es, R.J., Cardoso, C.S., Soares, S.M., Ascensão, A., Colaço, P.J.<br />

& Vilas-Boas J.P. (2003). Time limit <strong>and</strong> VO2 slow component at<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensities correspond<strong>in</strong>g to VO2max <strong>in</strong> swimmers. Int J Sports Med.<br />

24, 576-581.<br />

244<br />

Leger, L.A., Seliger, V. & Brassard, L. (1980). Backward extrapolation<br />

of VO2max values from the O2 recovery curve. Med Sci Sports Exerc.<br />

12 (1), 24-27.<br />

Maglischo, E.W. (1993). Swimm<strong>in</strong>g Even Faster, Mayfield Pub. Co.,<br />

Chapter 13. pp. 417-450.<br />

Montpetit, R.R., Leger, L.A., Lavoie, J.M. & Cazorla, G. (1981). VO2<br />

peak dur<strong>in</strong>g free swimm<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g the backward extrapolation of the<br />

O2 recovery curve. Eur J Appl. Physiol & Occup Physiol. 47, 385-391.<br />

Niewiadomski, W., Gasiorowska, A., Krauss, B., Mroz, A. & Cybulski,<br />

G. (2007). Suppression of heart rate variability after supramaximal<br />

exertion. Cl<strong>in</strong> Physiol Funct Imag<strong>in</strong>g. 27, 309-319.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!